Un an après : changements éprouvés par les civils et les intervenants exposés aux attentats de novembre 2015 à Paris

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Fierdepied , Y. Motreff , P. Pirard , T. Baubet
{"title":"Un an après : changements éprouvés par les civils et les intervenants exposés aux attentats de novembre 2015 à Paris","authors":"S. Fierdepied ,&nbsp;Y. Motreff ,&nbsp;P. Pirard ,&nbsp;T. Baubet","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>One year after the attacks of November 13, 2015, Santé publique France, within the framework of the 13-November program, set up the Post-Attacks Public Health Survey of November 2015 (ESPA November 13) aimed at exposed civilians and responders. Several open questions are proposed including our question of interest: “Would you say that the experience you have had has changed you, in one way or another? Could you explain to us how?</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim is to understand the effect of attacks on civilians and responders and to compare their responses.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A thematic analysis is proposed for each of the two groups. The themes are common to them but appear to be qualitatively different. The qualitative analysis is supplemented and refined by figures concerning the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents in each group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some respondents (mainly male workers) do not feel any change. They have specific protective factors. Painful changes at the relational, emotional, and psychic level impact above all female civilians. Some changes take the form of resilience or even post-traumatic growth. They presuppose a process of transformation, which involves a reappropriation of one's existence (for a quarter of civilians and workers alike) but also a new relationship to the world (among workers who worked on the night of November 13) and to oneself (mainly for civilians, women).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The impact of the attacks is greater for civilians and particularly women. The process of transformation observed can lead to favorable outcomes that do not, however, avoid suffering. It would be appropriate to transpose some of the protection factors from the responders to the civilian populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages 333-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298424000190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

One year after the attacks of November 13, 2015, Santé publique France, within the framework of the 13-November program, set up the Post-Attacks Public Health Survey of November 2015 (ESPA November 13) aimed at exposed civilians and responders. Several open questions are proposed including our question of interest: “Would you say that the experience you have had has changed you, in one way or another? Could you explain to us how?

Objective

The aim is to understand the effect of attacks on civilians and responders and to compare their responses.

Method

A thematic analysis is proposed for each of the two groups. The themes are common to them but appear to be qualitatively different. The qualitative analysis is supplemented and refined by figures concerning the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents in each group.

Results

Some respondents (mainly male workers) do not feel any change. They have specific protective factors. Painful changes at the relational, emotional, and psychic level impact above all female civilians. Some changes take the form of resilience or even post-traumatic growth. They presuppose a process of transformation, which involves a reappropriation of one's existence (for a quarter of civilians and workers alike) but also a new relationship to the world (among workers who worked on the night of November 13) and to oneself (mainly for civilians, women).

Conclusion

The impact of the attacks is greater for civilians and particularly women. The process of transformation observed can lead to favorable outcomes that do not, however, avoid suffering. It would be appropriate to transpose some of the protection factors from the responders to the civilian populations.
一年后:2015年11月巴黎恐怖袭击的平民和参与者所经历的变化
在2015年11月13日袭击事件发生一年后,在11月13日计划的框架内,法国圣公共部门设立了2015年11月袭击后公共卫生调查(ESPA 11月13日),针对暴露的平民和应急人员。书中提出了几个开放性问题,包括我们感兴趣的问题:“你会说你的经历在某种程度上改变了你吗?”你能解释一下怎么做吗?目的了解袭击对平民和救援人员的影响,并比较他们的反应。方法对两组分别进行专题分析。主题对他们来说是共同的,但似乎在性质上有所不同。关于每一组受访者的社会人口特征的数据补充和完善了定性分析。结果部分受访者(主要为男性员工)没有感觉到任何变化。它们有特定的保护因素。在关系,情感和精神层面上的痛苦变化对女性平民的影响最大。有些变化以恢复力甚至创伤后成长的形式出现。他们预设了一个转变的过程,包括重新占有自己的存在(对于四分之一的平民和工人来说),但也包括与世界(在11月13日晚上工作的工人)和自己(主要是平民,妇女)的新关系。袭击对平民的影响更大,尤其是对妇女。观察到的转变过程可以带来有利的结果,但并不能避免痛苦。适当的做法是将一些保护因素从应急人员转移到平民人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信