Soil organic nitrogen sequestrated more in oilseed rape-rice rotation than in wheat-rice rotation under different fertilizations

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jian Zhao, Tao Ren, Yating Fang, Shuntao Zhang, Rihuan Cong, Xiaokun Li, Zhifeng Lu, Jun Zhu, Jianwei Lu
{"title":"Soil organic nitrogen sequestrated more in oilseed rape-rice rotation than in wheat-rice rotation under different fertilizations","authors":"Jian Zhao,&nbsp;Tao Ren,&nbsp;Yating Fang,&nbsp;Shuntao Zhang,&nbsp;Rihuan Cong,&nbsp;Xiaokun Li,&nbsp;Zhifeng Lu,&nbsp;Jun Zhu,&nbsp;Jianwei Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oilseed rape-rice (OR) and wheat-rice (W<em>R</em>) rotations with different fertilizations are common practices in cropland management in the Yangtze River Basin. The sequestration of soil organic nitrogen (SON) plays a critical role in the preservation and sustained supply of nitrogen in cropland. However, few studies have focused on the impacts of crop rotation and fertilization on SON sequestration. Here, we observed the differences in SON sequestration between OR and W<em>R</em> rotations through a 6 years field experiment, each rotation pattern contained four fertilization treatments, including no fertilizer application (CK), nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer application (NPK), replace 50 % nitrogen in NPK treatment with organic fertilizer (1/2NPKM), and NPK fertilizer and straw returning (NPKS). The results indicated that SON sequestration was 0.37–1.16 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in OR rotation and 0.20–0.89 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in W<em>R</em> rotation in the examined fertilization treatments. It was clear that SON sequestration in OR rotation was higher than that in W<em>R</em> rotation. The OR rotation also showed higher contents of soil labile organic nitrogen (LON) and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) than W<em>R</em> rotation in corresponding fertilization treatments. Active organic nitrogen (LON and PON) was the primary nitrogen pool that resulted in the difference between OR and W<em>R</em> rotation in SON sequestration. Compared with NPK treatment, 1/2NPKM and NPKS treatments increased SON sequestration respectively by 16 % and 23 % in OR rotation, and by 30 % and 29 % in W<em>R</em> rotation. Therefore, OR rotation sequestered more SON than W<em>R</em> rotation, straw returning and combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers benefited SON sequestration in both rotations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 109445"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924005632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oilseed rape-rice (OR) and wheat-rice (WR) rotations with different fertilizations are common practices in cropland management in the Yangtze River Basin. The sequestration of soil organic nitrogen (SON) plays a critical role in the preservation and sustained supply of nitrogen in cropland. However, few studies have focused on the impacts of crop rotation and fertilization on SON sequestration. Here, we observed the differences in SON sequestration between OR and WR rotations through a 6 years field experiment, each rotation pattern contained four fertilization treatments, including no fertilizer application (CK), nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer application (NPK), replace 50 % nitrogen in NPK treatment with organic fertilizer (1/2NPKM), and NPK fertilizer and straw returning (NPKS). The results indicated that SON sequestration was 0.37–1.16 t ha−1 in OR rotation and 0.20–0.89 t ha−1 in WR rotation in the examined fertilization treatments. It was clear that SON sequestration in OR rotation was higher than that in WR rotation. The OR rotation also showed higher contents of soil labile organic nitrogen (LON) and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) than WR rotation in corresponding fertilization treatments. Active organic nitrogen (LON and PON) was the primary nitrogen pool that resulted in the difference between OR and WR rotation in SON sequestration. Compared with NPK treatment, 1/2NPKM and NPKS treatments increased SON sequestration respectively by 16 % and 23 % in OR rotation, and by 30 % and 29 % in WR rotation. Therefore, OR rotation sequestered more SON than WR rotation, straw returning and combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers benefited SON sequestration in both rotations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信