The politics of renewable energy transition in Ghana: Issues, obstacles and prospects

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
George Tettey , Emefa Aku Ansah , William Asante
{"title":"The politics of renewable energy transition in Ghana: Issues, obstacles and prospects","authors":"George Tettey ,&nbsp;Emefa Aku Ansah ,&nbsp;William Asante","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global issues such as climate change and its associated negative impacts have reinforced the quest for more renewable energy sources. In line with this, world leaders in 2015 initiated a new direction for the world through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) specifically calls for among other things, substantial increase in the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. Against this backdrop, the Government of Ghana set a 10 % renewable energy generation target to be attained in 2020. However, this became a myth rather than a reality. Thus the Government of Ghana has extended its renewable energy target of 10 % to the year 2030. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study sought to unpack the circumstances leading to government's inability to meet the 10 % target, and what lessons could be drawn for meeting the new set target. Adopting Kingdon's Multiple Streams as a framework for analysis, the study found that although appropriate windows of opportunity were opened for coupling the streams of problem, policy and politics, policy entrepreneurs were reluctant to perform their coupling role. This was due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, the fact that Ghana has excess capacity and did not need more energy; the controversies surrounding the definition of hydro-energy; and unenthusiastic public opinion. The study encourages a more inclusive and participatory approach to energize stakeholders' efforts in similar future ventures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103939"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global issues such as climate change and its associated negative impacts have reinforced the quest for more renewable energy sources. In line with this, world leaders in 2015 initiated a new direction for the world through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) specifically calls for among other things, substantial increase in the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. Against this backdrop, the Government of Ghana set a 10 % renewable energy generation target to be attained in 2020. However, this became a myth rather than a reality. Thus the Government of Ghana has extended its renewable energy target of 10 % to the year 2030. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study sought to unpack the circumstances leading to government's inability to meet the 10 % target, and what lessons could be drawn for meeting the new set target. Adopting Kingdon's Multiple Streams as a framework for analysis, the study found that although appropriate windows of opportunity were opened for coupling the streams of problem, policy and politics, policy entrepreneurs were reluctant to perform their coupling role. This was due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, the fact that Ghana has excess capacity and did not need more energy; the controversies surrounding the definition of hydro-energy; and unenthusiastic public opinion. The study encourages a more inclusive and participatory approach to energize stakeholders' efforts in similar future ventures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信