{"title":"The politics of renewable energy transition in Ghana: Issues, obstacles and prospects","authors":"George Tettey , Emefa Aku Ansah , William Asante","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global issues such as climate change and its associated negative impacts have reinforced the quest for more renewable energy sources. In line with this, world leaders in 2015 initiated a new direction for the world through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) specifically calls for among other things, substantial increase in the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. Against this backdrop, the Government of Ghana set a 10 % renewable energy generation target to be attained in 2020. However, this became a myth rather than a reality. Thus the Government of Ghana has extended its renewable energy target of 10 % to the year 2030. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study sought to unpack the circumstances leading to government's inability to meet the 10 % target, and what lessons could be drawn for meeting the new set target. Adopting Kingdon's Multiple Streams as a framework for analysis, the study found that although appropriate windows of opportunity were opened for coupling the streams of problem, policy and politics, policy entrepreneurs were reluctant to perform their coupling role. This was due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, the fact that Ghana has excess capacity and did not need more energy; the controversies surrounding the definition of hydro-energy; and unenthusiastic public opinion. The study encourages a more inclusive and participatory approach to energize stakeholders' efforts in similar future ventures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103939"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global issues such as climate change and its associated negative impacts have reinforced the quest for more renewable energy sources. In line with this, world leaders in 2015 initiated a new direction for the world through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) specifically calls for among other things, substantial increase in the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. Against this backdrop, the Government of Ghana set a 10 % renewable energy generation target to be attained in 2020. However, this became a myth rather than a reality. Thus the Government of Ghana has extended its renewable energy target of 10 % to the year 2030. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study sought to unpack the circumstances leading to government's inability to meet the 10 % target, and what lessons could be drawn for meeting the new set target. Adopting Kingdon's Multiple Streams as a framework for analysis, the study found that although appropriate windows of opportunity were opened for coupling the streams of problem, policy and politics, policy entrepreneurs were reluctant to perform their coupling role. This was due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, the fact that Ghana has excess capacity and did not need more energy; the controversies surrounding the definition of hydro-energy; and unenthusiastic public opinion. The study encourages a more inclusive and participatory approach to energize stakeholders' efforts in similar future ventures.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.