{"title":"The Political Economy of local content policy: The Brazilian Oil Industry in the 21st century","authors":"Beni Trojbicz , Mariane Santos Françoso","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study used a Political Economy framework to analyze the political dynamics underlying the design of Local Content Policies (LCPs) and the interaction between technical and political factors in shaping policy guidelines in Brazil from 2003 to 2017. Using a case study, we drew up in-depth interviews, document analysis, and quantitative data to understand the roles of diverse stakeholders in the LCP design process. LCPs are commonly implemented by resource-rich countries to stimulate economic development. The Brazilian oil and gas industry has significantly increased in the early twenty-first century following significant hydrocarbon reserves found in the Continental Shelf. Consequently, LCPs were introduced to maximize the economic benefits of hydrocarbon exploration. However, corruption scandals and corporate bankruptcies negatively affected these policies. Our analysis showed that LCPs faced design failures and inconsistencies over time due to the dominance of vested interests over fundamental technical considerations. Furthermore, ideological shifts within the government intensified policy instability. This study contributes to the discussion on industrial policy design by highlighting the complexities and challenges that undermine the effective implementation of LCP objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105430"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007979","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study used a Political Economy framework to analyze the political dynamics underlying the design of Local Content Policies (LCPs) and the interaction between technical and political factors in shaping policy guidelines in Brazil from 2003 to 2017. Using a case study, we drew up in-depth interviews, document analysis, and quantitative data to understand the roles of diverse stakeholders in the LCP design process. LCPs are commonly implemented by resource-rich countries to stimulate economic development. The Brazilian oil and gas industry has significantly increased in the early twenty-first century following significant hydrocarbon reserves found in the Continental Shelf. Consequently, LCPs were introduced to maximize the economic benefits of hydrocarbon exploration. However, corruption scandals and corporate bankruptcies negatively affected these policies. Our analysis showed that LCPs faced design failures and inconsistencies over time due to the dominance of vested interests over fundamental technical considerations. Furthermore, ideological shifts within the government intensified policy instability. This study contributes to the discussion on industrial policy design by highlighting the complexities and challenges that undermine the effective implementation of LCP objectives.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.