Chromatographic Retention Index for the Identification of Illicit Substances

G.H. Giudice, A.H.L. Machado, J.J. Zacca, M.P. Souza, L.N.B. Caldas, E.D. Botelho, J.C.L. Ambrósio
{"title":"Chromatographic Retention Index for the Identification of Illicit Substances","authors":"G.H. Giudice,&nbsp;A.H.L. Machado,&nbsp;J.J. Zacca,&nbsp;M.P. Souza,&nbsp;L.N.B. Caldas,&nbsp;E.D. Botelho,&nbsp;J.C.L. Ambrósio","doi":"10.1016/j.etdah.2023.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>New Psychoactive Substances have a high introduction rate into the market and represent a huge challenge from a regulatory and forensic point of view. Thus, the need for a method capable of identifying NPS, without the availability of certified analytical standards, arises.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The methodology of the work relies on the development of a GC/MS method; its validation; and the calculation of the Kovats’ Retention Index. This index was selected because it was reported as a tool for high-precision identification. A total of twenty-two substances were used: AM-2201, MAM-2201, JWH-081, JWH-210, N-ethylpentylone, 5-MAPB, 2-FA, 25C-NBOMe, o-CPP, p-CPP, U-47700, 5-MeO-MiPT, 5-IAI, Salvia divinorium, methiopropamine, THC, heroin, amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, cocaine, and ephedrine.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The method presented one Selectivity limitation (coelution of methiopropamine and methamphetamine). Resolution values were higher than 1.25, indicating signal separation. Separation Factor, Number of Theoretical Plates, and Tailing provided satisfactory results. Evaluation of Intermediate Precision indicated Relative Standard Deviations (RSD) that varied from 0.02 to 0.29%, lower than the literature. Robustness evaluation using a Fractional Factorial Design identified that changing the column polarity was the most influential factor, while column brand, gas flow, split rate, injector temperature, and ramp temperature did not interfere significantly. Retention Index was calculated without overlap and the Global Confidence Interval varied from 0,5 to 20,6 Retention Index Unity and the RSD varied from 0,02 to 0,29%, inferior to the range found in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of the development and validation indicate the adequacy of the method that uses Kovats’ Retention Index to identify NPS. The collection of Index calculated can be updated and made available to forensic institutes to be used as a tool in NPS identification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72899,"journal":{"name":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

New Psychoactive Substances have a high introduction rate into the market and represent a huge challenge from a regulatory and forensic point of view. Thus, the need for a method capable of identifying NPS, without the availability of certified analytical standards, arises.

Methods

The methodology of the work relies on the development of a GC/MS method; its validation; and the calculation of the Kovats’ Retention Index. This index was selected because it was reported as a tool for high-precision identification. A total of twenty-two substances were used: AM-2201, MAM-2201, JWH-081, JWH-210, N-ethylpentylone, 5-MAPB, 2-FA, 25C-NBOMe, o-CPP, p-CPP, U-47700, 5-MeO-MiPT, 5-IAI, Salvia divinorium, methiopropamine, THC, heroin, amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, cocaine, and ephedrine.

Results

The method presented one Selectivity limitation (coelution of methiopropamine and methamphetamine). Resolution values were higher than 1.25, indicating signal separation. Separation Factor, Number of Theoretical Plates, and Tailing provided satisfactory results. Evaluation of Intermediate Precision indicated Relative Standard Deviations (RSD) that varied from 0.02 to 0.29%, lower than the literature. Robustness evaluation using a Fractional Factorial Design identified that changing the column polarity was the most influential factor, while column brand, gas flow, split rate, injector temperature, and ramp temperature did not interfere significantly. Retention Index was calculated without overlap and the Global Confidence Interval varied from 0,5 to 20,6 Retention Index Unity and the RSD varied from 0,02 to 0,29%, inferior to the range found in the literature.

Conclusions

The results of the development and validation indicate the adequacy of the method that uses Kovats’ Retention Index to identify NPS. The collection of Index calculated can be updated and made available to forensic institutes to be used as a tool in NPS identification.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Forensic Medicine, Drug Discovery, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (General)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信