Ocean acidification signals through deep time: A review of proxies

Subham Patra, Jahnavi Punekar
{"title":"Ocean acidification signals through deep time: A review of proxies","authors":"Subham Patra,&nbsp;Jahnavi Punekar","doi":"10.1016/j.eve.2024.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic CO₂ levels have increased by nearly 40% from preindustrial levels, with about 30% absorbed by the ocean leading to ocean acidification (OA). The associated carbonate undersaturation can critically affect marine calcifying communities. Major disruptions in the marine carbonate cycling are common throughout the Phanerozoic stratigraphic record, and often coincide with major mass extinctions and faunal turnover events. The anthropogenic OA is progressing at a rate nearly ten times faster than similar events of the past 300 million years. This makes OA research of high priority, and entails a rigorous evaluation of OA events from deep time for perspective. Such efforts are contingent upon reliable proxies. This review compiles geochemical and foraminifera-based proxies, offering a critical assessment of their fidelity, ease of use, and application scope.</div><div>This study evaluates the scope and utility of documented observational and analytical proxies based on factors like the nature of data, and the time, effort and advanced analytical facilities involved. Foraminifera-based observational proxies like morphological and community responses to OA are effective but demand taxonomic expertise. They are further complicated by vital effects, metabolic trade-offs, the influence of stressors other than ocean acidification, and paleogeographic variability in both the magnitude of stress and the organisms' response to it. Well-calibrated analytical (geochemical) proxies offer the potential for rapid, high-resolution records across various sites. All proxies face challenges from diagenetic alterations, which can affect their reliability. However, this review offers the pros/cons and practical recommendations for proxy utility, emphasing the need for a multi-proxy approach to enhance accuracy and cross-verification. Future research must urgently address plankton community responses, OA-tolerant taxa, and localized calcification environments to grasp the full impact of acidification. It is critical to refine lesser-known proxies (e.g., S/Ca) and to rapidly expand datasets on carbonate system parameters across Phanerozoic OA events to advance our understanding and mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100516,"journal":{"name":"Evolving Earth","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolving Earth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950117224000268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic CO₂ levels have increased by nearly 40% from preindustrial levels, with about 30% absorbed by the ocean leading to ocean acidification (OA). The associated carbonate undersaturation can critically affect marine calcifying communities. Major disruptions in the marine carbonate cycling are common throughout the Phanerozoic stratigraphic record, and often coincide with major mass extinctions and faunal turnover events. The anthropogenic OA is progressing at a rate nearly ten times faster than similar events of the past 300 million years. This makes OA research of high priority, and entails a rigorous evaluation of OA events from deep time for perspective. Such efforts are contingent upon reliable proxies. This review compiles geochemical and foraminifera-based proxies, offering a critical assessment of their fidelity, ease of use, and application scope.
This study evaluates the scope and utility of documented observational and analytical proxies based on factors like the nature of data, and the time, effort and advanced analytical facilities involved. Foraminifera-based observational proxies like morphological and community responses to OA are effective but demand taxonomic expertise. They are further complicated by vital effects, metabolic trade-offs, the influence of stressors other than ocean acidification, and paleogeographic variability in both the magnitude of stress and the organisms' response to it. Well-calibrated analytical (geochemical) proxies offer the potential for rapid, high-resolution records across various sites. All proxies face challenges from diagenetic alterations, which can affect their reliability. However, this review offers the pros/cons and practical recommendations for proxy utility, emphasing the need for a multi-proxy approach to enhance accuracy and cross-verification. Future research must urgently address plankton community responses, OA-tolerant taxa, and localized calcification environments to grasp the full impact of acidification. It is critical to refine lesser-known proxies (e.g., S/Ca) and to rapidly expand datasets on carbonate system parameters across Phanerozoic OA events to advance our understanding and mitigation strategies.
海洋酸化的深时间信号:代用指标综述
人为产生的二氧化碳水平比工业化前水平增加了近40%,其中约30%被海洋吸收,导致海洋酸化(OA)。伴生的碳酸盐欠饱和会严重影响海洋钙化群落。在显生宙地层记录中,海相碳酸盐循环的主要中断是常见的,并且经常与主要的大灭绝和动物更替事件同时发生。与过去3亿年的类似事件相比,人为OA的进展速度快了近10倍。这使得OA研究具有很高的优先级,并且需要从深度时间角度对OA事件进行严格的评估。这种努力取决于可靠的代理。本文综述了基于地球化学和有孔虫的代理,对它们的保真度、易用性和应用范围进行了批判性评估。本研究基于数据的性质、时间、精力和所涉及的先进分析设施等因素,评估了记录观测和分析代理的范围和效用。以有孔虫为基础的观察代理,如形态学和群落对OA的反应是有效的,但需要分类学的专业知识。生命效应、代谢权衡、海洋酸化以外的压力源的影响、压力大小和生物体对压力的反应的古地理变异性使它们进一步复杂化。校准良好的分析(地球化学)代理提供了在不同地点快速、高分辨率记录的潜力。所有代理都面临着成岩变化的挑战,这可能会影响它们的可靠性。然而,这篇综述提供了代理工具的利弊和实用建议,强调需要多代理方法来提高准确性和交叉验证。未来的研究必须迫切解决浮游生物群落响应、耐oa分类群和局部钙化环境等问题,以掌握酸化的全面影响。关键是要完善鲜为人知的代理(例如S/Ca),并迅速扩展显生宙OA事件中碳酸盐系统参数的数据集,以促进我们的理解和缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信