Thermal and economic evaluation of replacing pulverized coal with torrefied biomass in a small industrial burner in Thailand using computational fluid dynamics

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Rachapat Chaiyo, Jakrapop Wongwiwat, Yanin Sukjai
{"title":"Thermal and economic evaluation of replacing pulverized coal with torrefied biomass in a small industrial burner in Thailand using computational fluid dynamics","authors":"Rachapat Chaiyo,&nbsp;Jakrapop Wongwiwat,&nbsp;Yanin Sukjai","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.100898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to the global warming crisis, the use of carbon-neutral biomass as a substitute for coal has gained significant attention due to its comparable combustion properties. This approach allows for minimal modifications to existing fuel systems. However, biomass has limitations, including its fibrous structure, which complicates grinding, and high moisture content, leading to lower power density and increased soot emissions. To overcome these challenges, torrefaction, a process involving the heating of raw biomass to around 200–300 °C, has emerged as a promising solution. This method improves the fuel's quality, reducing its moisture content and enhancing grindability, though it requires heat energy and raw material compensation for mass loss. This study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling using ANSYS Fluent to analyze the combustion behavior of torrefied biomass produced under varying severity conditions. The results indicate that intensifying the torrefaction process increases combustion temperatures due to the fuel's higher calorific value and reduced moisture. Additionally, improved grinding capabilities reduce particle size, further enhancing combustion. Compared to conventional biomass, torrefied biomass shows a 28% increase in heat energy, rising from 220 to 279 kW, surpassing coal's 273 kW. Carbon monoxide emissions are significantly reduced by 93%, from 1044–72 kg/MWh, while coal emissions are 20 kg/MWh. However, nitrogen oxide emissions increased by 217%, from 0.17 to 0.54 kg/MWh, though still lower than coal's 0.72 kg/MWh. A cost analysis reveals that torrefaction conditions yielding a solid yield of 0.7 offers the lowest energy cost, approximately 114 Baht/GJ, a 14% reduction compared to conventional biomass and 37% lower than coal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100898"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the global warming crisis, the use of carbon-neutral biomass as a substitute for coal has gained significant attention due to its comparable combustion properties. This approach allows for minimal modifications to existing fuel systems. However, biomass has limitations, including its fibrous structure, which complicates grinding, and high moisture content, leading to lower power density and increased soot emissions. To overcome these challenges, torrefaction, a process involving the heating of raw biomass to around 200–300 °C, has emerged as a promising solution. This method improves the fuel's quality, reducing its moisture content and enhancing grindability, though it requires heat energy and raw material compensation for mass loss. This study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling using ANSYS Fluent to analyze the combustion behavior of torrefied biomass produced under varying severity conditions. The results indicate that intensifying the torrefaction process increases combustion temperatures due to the fuel's higher calorific value and reduced moisture. Additionally, improved grinding capabilities reduce particle size, further enhancing combustion. Compared to conventional biomass, torrefied biomass shows a 28% increase in heat energy, rising from 220 to 279 kW, surpassing coal's 273 kW. Carbon monoxide emissions are significantly reduced by 93%, from 1044–72 kg/MWh, while coal emissions are 20 kg/MWh. However, nitrogen oxide emissions increased by 217%, from 0.17 to 0.54 kg/MWh, though still lower than coal's 0.72 kg/MWh. A cost analysis reveals that torrefaction conditions yielding a solid yield of 0.7 offers the lowest energy cost, approximately 114 Baht/GJ, a 14% reduction compared to conventional biomass and 37% lower than coal.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信