Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions of high-speed rail with other transportation modes from life cycle perspective: A case of Beijing-Shanghai

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Da Liu , Jiaying Wang , Linlin Xu , Haoyan Zhang , Xinxin Tan
{"title":"Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions of high-speed rail with other transportation modes from life cycle perspective: A case of Beijing-Shanghai","authors":"Da Liu ,&nbsp;Jiaying Wang ,&nbsp;Linlin Xu ,&nbsp;Haoyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinxin Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-speed rail (HSR) is considered clean and low carbon footprint because it relies on electricity and its a high carrying capacity, compared with other transportation modes. However, previous studies have not quantified the combined impacts of greener electricity and modal shift on the energy efficiency and emission reduction benefits of HSR. Here, this paper compares the energy consumption and carbon footprint of four transportation modes on the Beijing-Shanghai line in China using life cycle assessment. Firstly, we develop a life-cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions modal for the transportation modes. Second, we assess the energy consumption and carbon footprint of different transportation modes at each stage. Subsequently, we calculate the net carbon emissions of HSR under the modal shift and four greener electricity development policies separately. Finally, we conduct a sensitivity analysis of the main factors. The results indicate that: (1) the shift of the modal from road and air strengthens the emission reduction advantages of HSR. However, the limited carrying capacity of HSR makes it challenging to achieve further carbon reduction through the modal shift; (2) greener electricity can make the most substantial contribution to the future carbon reduction, potentially reducing carbon emissions by 20.93 % to 52.67 % throughout the life-cycle; (3) the 17 % carbon emissions mitigation implied by HSR construction depends heavily on a stable passenger traffic flow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524001809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-speed rail (HSR) is considered clean and low carbon footprint because it relies on electricity and its a high carrying capacity, compared with other transportation modes. However, previous studies have not quantified the combined impacts of greener electricity and modal shift on the energy efficiency and emission reduction benefits of HSR. Here, this paper compares the energy consumption and carbon footprint of four transportation modes on the Beijing-Shanghai line in China using life cycle assessment. Firstly, we develop a life-cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions modal for the transportation modes. Second, we assess the energy consumption and carbon footprint of different transportation modes at each stage. Subsequently, we calculate the net carbon emissions of HSR under the modal shift and four greener electricity development policies separately. Finally, we conduct a sensitivity analysis of the main factors. The results indicate that: (1) the shift of the modal from road and air strengthens the emission reduction advantages of HSR. However, the limited carrying capacity of HSR makes it challenging to achieve further carbon reduction through the modal shift; (2) greener electricity can make the most substantial contribution to the future carbon reduction, potentially reducing carbon emissions by 20.93 % to 52.67 % throughout the life-cycle; (3) the 17 % carbon emissions mitigation implied by HSR construction depends heavily on a stable passenger traffic flow.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信