Analytical and numerical approaches to the analysis of progress curves: A methodological comparison

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Thomas Waluga, Francesca von Ziegner, Mirko Skiborowski
{"title":"Analytical and numerical approaches to the analysis of progress curves: A methodological comparison","authors":"Thomas Waluga,&nbsp;Francesca von Ziegner,&nbsp;Mirko Skiborowski","doi":"10.1016/j.procbio.2025.01.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate models of the reaction kinetics of enzymatic reactions are essential for the design of biocatalytic processes. While many experimental studies still build on initial slope analysis, progress curve analysis offers the potential for modelling enzymatic reactions with a significantly lower experimental effort in terms of time and costs, but requires the solution of a dynamic nonlinear optimization problem. There are many different approaches for solving this problem for parameter regression, building on the experimental progress curve data. In order to provide some guidance for selecting an appropriate approach, this study presents a detailed comparison of two analytical and two numerical approaches analysing their strengths and weaknesses on the basis of three case studies. The analytical approaches build on the implicit and explicit integrals of the respective reaction rate equations, while the numerical approaches consider the direct numerical integration of the differential mass balance equations as well as the transformation of the dynamic problem to an algebraic problem by means of spline interpolation of the reaction data. In particular, the dependence of the results on the initial parameter estimates is evaluated, showcasing that the numerical solution with spline interpolation shows a lower dependence on the initial values providing parameter estimates comparable to the analytical approaches, which are however limited in applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20811,"journal":{"name":"Process Biochemistry","volume":"151 ","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359511325000376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate models of the reaction kinetics of enzymatic reactions are essential for the design of biocatalytic processes. While many experimental studies still build on initial slope analysis, progress curve analysis offers the potential for modelling enzymatic reactions with a significantly lower experimental effort in terms of time and costs, but requires the solution of a dynamic nonlinear optimization problem. There are many different approaches for solving this problem for parameter regression, building on the experimental progress curve data. In order to provide some guidance for selecting an appropriate approach, this study presents a detailed comparison of two analytical and two numerical approaches analysing their strengths and weaknesses on the basis of three case studies. The analytical approaches build on the implicit and explicit integrals of the respective reaction rate equations, while the numerical approaches consider the direct numerical integration of the differential mass balance equations as well as the transformation of the dynamic problem to an algebraic problem by means of spline interpolation of the reaction data. In particular, the dependence of the results on the initial parameter estimates is evaluated, showcasing that the numerical solution with spline interpolation shows a lower dependence on the initial values providing parameter estimates comparable to the analytical approaches, which are however limited in applicability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Biochemistry
Process Biochemistry 生物-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
374
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Process Biochemistry is an application-orientated research journal devoted to reporting advances with originality and novelty, in the science and technology of the processes involving bioactive molecules and living organisms. These processes concern the production of useful metabolites or materials, or the removal of toxic compounds using tools and methods of current biology and engineering. Its main areas of interest include novel bioprocesses and enabling technologies (such as nanobiotechnology, tissue engineering, directed evolution, metabolic engineering, systems biology, and synthetic biology) applicable in food (nutraceutical), healthcare (medical, pharmaceutical, cosmetic), energy (biofuels), environmental, and biorefinery industries and their underlying biological and engineering principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信