Cooperate with aggregation platform or not? Optimal decision for the on-demand ride service platform

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Lina Ma , Zhijie Tao , Qiang Wei , Baofeng Huo
{"title":"Cooperate with aggregation platform or not? Optimal decision for the on-demand ride service platform","authors":"Lina Ma ,&nbsp;Zhijie Tao ,&nbsp;Qiang Wei ,&nbsp;Baofeng Huo","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the emergence of aggregation mode has enabled consumers to access multiple ride service platforms through a single app, including small and medium-sized platforms. This relatively inclusive and equitable traffic distribution model not only presents new opportunities for these platforms but also heightens competitiveness among them. In this context, this paper establishes models to analyze the optimal cooperation strategies of ride service platforms and the impact of various factors on these strategies under different market conditions. The findings suggest that it is optimal for ride service platforms to cooperate with the aggregation platform. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the optimal pricing and profit of a ride service platform increase with its additional network externality. In a highly competitive market, the optimal pricing and profit will decrease with the rival platform's additional network externality and increase with the congestion level of both sides. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that while the aggregation platform has the right to choose cooperation, it will only collaborate with one ride service platform if the profit distribution from this cooperation exceeds that from partnering with both platforms. For the platform without cooperation, the outcome is not always worse than before, and the conditions for this scenario are provided. Finally, based on these conclusions, corresponding managerial implications are proposed for each stakeholder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524001536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the emergence of aggregation mode has enabled consumers to access multiple ride service platforms through a single app, including small and medium-sized platforms. This relatively inclusive and equitable traffic distribution model not only presents new opportunities for these platforms but also heightens competitiveness among them. In this context, this paper establishes models to analyze the optimal cooperation strategies of ride service platforms and the impact of various factors on these strategies under different market conditions. The findings suggest that it is optimal for ride service platforms to cooperate with the aggregation platform. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the optimal pricing and profit of a ride service platform increase with its additional network externality. In a highly competitive market, the optimal pricing and profit will decrease with the rival platform's additional network externality and increase with the congestion level of both sides. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that while the aggregation platform has the right to choose cooperation, it will only collaborate with one ride service platform if the profit distribution from this cooperation exceeds that from partnering with both platforms. For the platform without cooperation, the outcome is not always worse than before, and the conditions for this scenario are provided. Finally, based on these conclusions, corresponding managerial implications are proposed for each stakeholder.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信