Informativity enhances memory robustness against interference in sentence comprehension

IF 2.9 1区 心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Weijie Xu, Richard Futrell
{"title":"Informativity enhances memory robustness against interference in sentence comprehension","authors":"Weijie Xu,&nbsp;Richard Futrell","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Language comprehension has been argued to be expectation-based, with more predictable linguistic units being easier to process. However, as a communicative tool, language is often used to deliver messages that are novel and informative, suggesting the necessity of some cognitive mechanisms handling less predictable but more informative content. This paper proposes strategic memory allocation as one such mechanism. Although less predictable linguistic units require greater processing effort for memory encoding, recognizing the inconsistency between top-down predictions and bottom-up perceptual input may signal the working memory system to prioritize these units, enhancing the robustness of their representation against interference. We examine this hypothesis through the lens of the agreement attraction effect in two self-paced reading experiments. In Experiment 1, we find that less predictable but more informative target nouns exhibit weaker agreement attraction in online reading times, especially with more fine-grained measures of predictability such as the surprisal from large language models. This weaker agreement attraction effect for less predictable target nouns confirms our hypothesis that informative linguistic units are prioritized and receive more robust memory representation. In Experiment 2, however, no modulation of agreement attraction emerges when we manipulate the predictability of distractor nouns, suggesting the need for a more nuanced characterization of how information is structured and operated in memory. Our findings highlight an interplay of memory, predictive processing, and implicit learning. We also discuss the implications of our result for memory efficiency and memory compression. More broadly, by demonstrating that the limited memory resources are dynamically optimized for the relevant processing task, the current study highlights a connection to the resource-rational analysis of human cognition in general.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of memory and language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24001062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language comprehension has been argued to be expectation-based, with more predictable linguistic units being easier to process. However, as a communicative tool, language is often used to deliver messages that are novel and informative, suggesting the necessity of some cognitive mechanisms handling less predictable but more informative content. This paper proposes strategic memory allocation as one such mechanism. Although less predictable linguistic units require greater processing effort for memory encoding, recognizing the inconsistency between top-down predictions and bottom-up perceptual input may signal the working memory system to prioritize these units, enhancing the robustness of their representation against interference. We examine this hypothesis through the lens of the agreement attraction effect in two self-paced reading experiments. In Experiment 1, we find that less predictable but more informative target nouns exhibit weaker agreement attraction in online reading times, especially with more fine-grained measures of predictability such as the surprisal from large language models. This weaker agreement attraction effect for less predictable target nouns confirms our hypothesis that informative linguistic units are prioritized and receive more robust memory representation. In Experiment 2, however, no modulation of agreement attraction emerges when we manipulate the predictability of distractor nouns, suggesting the need for a more nuanced characterization of how information is structured and operated in memory. Our findings highlight an interplay of memory, predictive processing, and implicit learning. We also discuss the implications of our result for memory efficiency and memory compression. More broadly, by demonstrating that the limited memory resources are dynamically optimized for the relevant processing task, the current study highlights a connection to the resource-rational analysis of human cognition in general.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12.7 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in the Journal of Memory and Language contribute to the formulation of scientific issues and theories in the areas of memory, language comprehension and production, and cognitive processes. Special emphasis is given to research articles that provide new theoretical insights based on a carefully laid empirical foundation. The journal generally favors articles that provide multiple experiments. In addition, significant theoretical papers without new experimental findings may be published. The Journal of Memory and Language is a valuable tool for cognitive scientists, including psychologists, linguists, and others interested in memory and learning, language, reading, and speech. Research Areas include: • Topics that illuminate aspects of memory or language processing • Linguistics • Neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信