Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience
Alyssa Y. Choi MD , Peter H. Nguyen MD , Jaehyun Kim MD , Julie Yang MD , Sherif A. Andrawes MD , Jean Chalhoub MD , Anastasia Chahine MD , Andrew Q. Giap MD , David P. Lee MD , Kenneth H. Park MD , Quin Y. Liu MD , Srinivas Gaddam MD , Kendrick Che DO , Michael Lajin MD , Wasseem Skef MD , Amirali Tavangar MD , John J. Kim MD , Jason B. Samarasena MD, MBA
{"title":"Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience","authors":"Alyssa Y. Choi MD , Peter H. Nguyen MD , Jaehyun Kim MD , Julie Yang MD , Sherif A. Andrawes MD , Jean Chalhoub MD , Anastasia Chahine MD , Andrew Q. Giap MD , David P. Lee MD , Kenneth H. Park MD , Quin Y. Liu MD , Srinivas Gaddam MD , Kendrick Che DO , Michael Lajin MD , Wasseem Skef MD , Amirali Tavangar MD , John J. Kim MD , Jason B. Samarasena MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>A novel gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system was developed for resection of upper GI tract lesions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who received endoscopic resection of upper GI tract lesions from June 2020 to August 2022 using a gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device were evaluated from 8 U.S. centers. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were en bloc resection, residual lesions at follow-up endoscopy, and immediate or delayed adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 ± 15.8 years) received 45 resections for gastric (35, 80%) and duodenal (9, 20%) lesions. Thirty-four lesions (77%) were subepithelial and 10 (23%) were epithelial lesions. Technical success and en bloc resection were achieved in 43 (96%) and 41 (91%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, R0 resection was achieved in 32 patients (71%), including 24 of 35 (69%) with neoplastic lesions. Pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumor in 14 patients (32%), GI stromal tumor in 10 (23%), and gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia in 7 (16%). Minor immediate and delayed bleeding occurred in 17 (38%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. One patient had delayed perforation, managed conservatively. On follow-up, 19 of 21 patients (90%) had no residual lesion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this multicenter series, the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device demonstrated high rates of technical success and acceptable rate of R0 resection. Immediate minor bleeding was common, whereas serious adverse events were rare. This gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device should be considered in patients with gastroduodenal subepithelial lesions as an alternative to long-term surveillance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 490-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624001158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
A novel gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system was developed for resection of upper GI tract lesions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system.
Methods
Consecutive patients who received endoscopic resection of upper GI tract lesions from June 2020 to August 2022 using a gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device were evaluated from 8 U.S. centers. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were en bloc resection, residual lesions at follow-up endoscopy, and immediate or delayed adverse events.
Results
Forty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 ± 15.8 years) received 45 resections for gastric (35, 80%) and duodenal (9, 20%) lesions. Thirty-four lesions (77%) were subepithelial and 10 (23%) were epithelial lesions. Technical success and en bloc resection were achieved in 43 (96%) and 41 (91%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, R0 resection was achieved in 32 patients (71%), including 24 of 35 (69%) with neoplastic lesions. Pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumor in 14 patients (32%), GI stromal tumor in 10 (23%), and gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia in 7 (16%). Minor immediate and delayed bleeding occurred in 17 (38%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. One patient had delayed perforation, managed conservatively. On follow-up, 19 of 21 patients (90%) had no residual lesion.
Conclusions
In this multicenter series, the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device demonstrated high rates of technical success and acceptable rate of R0 resection. Immediate minor bleeding was common, whereas serious adverse events were rare. This gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device should be considered in patients with gastroduodenal subepithelial lesions as an alternative to long-term surveillance.