Efficacy of Nature-based Solutions for coastal protection under a changing climate: A modelling approach

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Massimiliano Marino, Sofia Nasca, Ahmad IK Alkharoubi, Luca Cavallaro, Enrico Foti, Rosaria Ester Musumeci
{"title":"Efficacy of Nature-based Solutions for coastal protection under a changing climate: A modelling approach","authors":"Massimiliano Marino,&nbsp;Sofia Nasca,&nbsp;Ahmad IK Alkharoubi,&nbsp;Luca Cavallaro,&nbsp;Enrico Foti,&nbsp;Rosaria Ester Musumeci","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are emerging as sustainable alternatives to conventional coastal defences against flooding and erosion. However, modelling applications to assess their efficacy often employ deterministic approaches based on historical storms, seldom incorporating effects of climate change. We argue that assessing coastal NbS performance for current and future scenarios is essential to ensure their long-term efficacy, adaptability, and potential synergies with climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. To this aim, we propose a modelling framework to investigate effectiveness of Nature-based coastal defences to mitigate climate change-driven, storm-induced flooding and erosion. An hydro-morphodynamic modelling chain (SWAN and XBeach) is setup to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions — a dune revegetation and a seagrass meadow reconstruction — in reducing coastal inundation and shoreline retreat. The study investigates present and future what-if scenarios, by simulating storm conditions based on present, 4.5, and 8.5 W/m<sup>2</sup> radiative forcing scenarios. Dissipative effects of vegetation are modelled by providing their characteristics and spatial distribution through habitat maps. Simple flooding and erosion reduction efficacy indicators are computed to support the assessment. The approach is applied to a case study along the Sicily coast (Italy). Results reveal that the vulnerability of the area to flooding is predominantly driven by sea level rise rather than by increase in significant wave height. In this regard, both considered interventions effectively reduce flooded areas across all investigated scenarios up to 66%, while the reconstruction of the seagrass meadow also significantly reduces storm-driven eroded volumes. Its efficacy however is less significant under 2100-time horizon scenarios, underscoring the need for NbS strategies that may be flexible and responsive to changing climate conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 104700"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383925000055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are emerging as sustainable alternatives to conventional coastal defences against flooding and erosion. However, modelling applications to assess their efficacy often employ deterministic approaches based on historical storms, seldom incorporating effects of climate change. We argue that assessing coastal NbS performance for current and future scenarios is essential to ensure their long-term efficacy, adaptability, and potential synergies with climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. To this aim, we propose a modelling framework to investigate effectiveness of Nature-based coastal defences to mitigate climate change-driven, storm-induced flooding and erosion. An hydro-morphodynamic modelling chain (SWAN and XBeach) is setup to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions — a dune revegetation and a seagrass meadow reconstruction — in reducing coastal inundation and shoreline retreat. The study investigates present and future what-if scenarios, by simulating storm conditions based on present, 4.5, and 8.5 W/m2 radiative forcing scenarios. Dissipative effects of vegetation are modelled by providing their characteristics and spatial distribution through habitat maps. Simple flooding and erosion reduction efficacy indicators are computed to support the assessment. The approach is applied to a case study along the Sicily coast (Italy). Results reveal that the vulnerability of the area to flooding is predominantly driven by sea level rise rather than by increase in significant wave height. In this regard, both considered interventions effectively reduce flooded areas across all investigated scenarios up to 66%, while the reconstruction of the seagrass meadow also significantly reduces storm-driven eroded volumes. Its efficacy however is less significant under 2100-time horizon scenarios, underscoring the need for NbS strategies that may be flexible and responsive to changing climate conditions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信