A comparative study between the impact of ultrasound guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) on the quality of postoperative analgesia and ambulation in hip arthroplasty

Q2 Nursing
Tamer Nabil Abdelrahman, Moustafa Mahmoud Abdelsattar, Mohamed Abdelmoneim Fouly, Mohsen Abdelghany Bassiouny, Sahar Mohamed Talaat
{"title":"A comparative study between the impact of ultrasound guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) on the quality of postoperative analgesia and ambulation in hip arthroplasty","authors":"Tamer Nabil Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Moustafa Mahmoud Abdelsattar,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdelmoneim Fouly,&nbsp;Mohsen Abdelghany Bassiouny,&nbsp;Sahar Mohamed Talaat","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hip surgeries are one of the common orthopedic surgeries, especially in the geriatricnpopulation following trauma, postoperative pain control and early ambulation are the main concerns for decreasing hospital stay and postoperative complications. We aimed to analyze the ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) effect versus fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) on the time needed for unaided mobilization and postoperative analgesics consumption in hip arthroplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was a randomized, prospective, comparative study carried out at Ain Shams University Hospital where 44 patients subjected to hip arthroplasty were randomized into two equal groups; Group (F) in which patients received FICB under ultrasound guidance and Group (P) in which patients received PENG under ultrasound guidance. Both blocks were performed by injecting 20 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine immediately after spinal anesthesia. The time needed for unaided mobilization was assessed by the time up and go test (TUG) and postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) in the first 24 h postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regarding ambulation data over the first 24 h following surgery, the time needed for unaided mobilization was significantly shorter in the PENG group than FICB group. No statistically significant differences were determined between both groups as regards postoperative complications, total narcotic consumption, and VAS score. Conclusions: The Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block demonstrated earlier unaided ambulation and delayed first rescue analgesia in hip arthroplasty compared to those who were administered Facia iliaca compartment blocks)FICB(in hip arthroplasty. Both blocks offered efficient postoperative pain control without difference in total opioid requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240560302500010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hip surgeries are one of the common orthopedic surgeries, especially in the geriatricnpopulation following trauma, postoperative pain control and early ambulation are the main concerns for decreasing hospital stay and postoperative complications. We aimed to analyze the ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) effect versus fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) on the time needed for unaided mobilization and postoperative analgesics consumption in hip arthroplasty.

Methods

The study was a randomized, prospective, comparative study carried out at Ain Shams University Hospital where 44 patients subjected to hip arthroplasty were randomized into two equal groups; Group (F) in which patients received FICB under ultrasound guidance and Group (P) in which patients received PENG under ultrasound guidance. Both blocks were performed by injecting 20 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine immediately after spinal anesthesia. The time needed for unaided mobilization was assessed by the time up and go test (TUG) and postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) in the first 24 h postoperatively.

Results

Regarding ambulation data over the first 24 h following surgery, the time needed for unaided mobilization was significantly shorter in the PENG group than FICB group. No statistically significant differences were determined between both groups as regards postoperative complications, total narcotic consumption, and VAS score. Conclusions: The Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block demonstrated earlier unaided ambulation and delayed first rescue analgesia in hip arthroplasty compared to those who were administered Facia iliaca compartment blocks)FICB(in hip arthroplasty. Both blocks offered efficient postoperative pain control without difference in total opioid requirements.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信