Insights into nurse educators' use of ChatGPT in active teaching methods: A cross-sectional pilot study

Q2 Social Sciences
Asma Bouriami , Kamal Takhdat , Sana Barkatou , Hajar Chiki , Samia Boussaa , Ahmed Rhassane El Adib
{"title":"Insights into nurse educators' use of ChatGPT in active teaching methods: A cross-sectional pilot study","authors":"Asma Bouriami ,&nbsp;Kamal Takhdat ,&nbsp;Sana Barkatou ,&nbsp;Hajar Chiki ,&nbsp;Samia Boussaa ,&nbsp;Ahmed Rhassane El Adib","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Artificial intelligence has revolutionized nursing education with the emergence of ChatGPT, which has the potential to transform active teaching methods. Despite this potential, there is still insufficient literature on the use of ChatGPT in nursing education. The aim of this pilot study is to examine nurse educators' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ChatGPT, as well as their experience of using ChatGPT in active teaching methods.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects and methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study using a self-administered questionnaire with 104 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although 61.52% of participants have an average level of knowledge about ChatGPT, they are not very familiar with its use, as 59.6% do not use it. In fact, 70.52% expressed indifference or negativity towards the use of ChatGPT by their students. Furthermore, male educators are five times more likely to believe that ChatGPT facilitates students cheating (OR = 5.147 (1.641; 16.141)).</div><div>Despite being aware of the challenges associated with ChatGPT, educators in our sample demonstrate limited awareness of its potential applications in active teaching methods. For instance, only 33.33% use ChatGPT in problem-based learning, while a mere 10% use ChatGPT in simulation-based learning. This reluctance extends to use ChatGPT in teaching activities such as preparing pedagogical content (8.69%) and the design of assessment tools (9.78%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementing institutional guidelines and providing nurse educators with training on the potential applications of ChatGPT are essential for promoting positive change in nursing education. This will enable educators to guide their students in the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 101006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324001219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Artificial intelligence has revolutionized nursing education with the emergence of ChatGPT, which has the potential to transform active teaching methods. Despite this potential, there is still insufficient literature on the use of ChatGPT in nursing education. The aim of this pilot study is to examine nurse educators' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ChatGPT, as well as their experience of using ChatGPT in active teaching methods.

Subjects and methods

We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study using a self-administered questionnaire with 104 participants.

Results

Although 61.52% of participants have an average level of knowledge about ChatGPT, they are not very familiar with its use, as 59.6% do not use it. In fact, 70.52% expressed indifference or negativity towards the use of ChatGPT by their students. Furthermore, male educators are five times more likely to believe that ChatGPT facilitates students cheating (OR = 5.147 (1.641; 16.141)).
Despite being aware of the challenges associated with ChatGPT, educators in our sample demonstrate limited awareness of its potential applications in active teaching methods. For instance, only 33.33% use ChatGPT in problem-based learning, while a mere 10% use ChatGPT in simulation-based learning. This reluctance extends to use ChatGPT in teaching activities such as preparing pedagogical content (8.69%) and the design of assessment tools (9.78%).

Conclusion

Implementing institutional guidelines and providing nurse educators with training on the potential applications of ChatGPT are essential for promoting positive change in nursing education. This will enable educators to guide their students in the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT.
护士教育工作者在主动教学方法中使用ChatGPT的见解:一项横断面试点研究
随着ChatGPT的出现,人工智能已经彻底改变了护理教育,它有可能改变积极的教学方法。尽管有这种潜力,关于ChatGPT在护理教育中的应用的文献仍然不足。本初步研究的目的是检查护士教育工作者对ChatGPT的知识、态度和看法,以及他们在主动教学方法中使用ChatGPT的经验。研究对象和方法我们对104名参与者进行了一项横断面的初步研究,采用自填问卷。结果61.52%的参与者对ChatGPT的知识水平处于中等水平,但对其使用并不十分熟悉,有59.6%的参与者不使用ChatGPT。事实上,70.52%的教师对学生使用ChatGPT表示冷漠或消极。此外,男性教育工作者认为ChatGPT有助于学生作弊的可能性是男性教育工作者的5倍(OR = 5.147 (1.641;16.141))。尽管意识到与ChatGPT相关的挑战,我们样本中的教育工作者对其在主动教学方法中的潜在应用的认识有限。例如,只有33.33%的人在基于问题的学习中使用ChatGPT,而只有10%的人在基于模拟的学习中使用ChatGPT。这种不情愿延伸到在教学活动中使用ChatGPT,例如准备教学内容(8.69%)和设计评估工具(9.78%)。结论实施制度指南,为护理教育者提供ChatGPT潜在应用的培训,对促进护理教育的积极变化至关重要。这将使教育工作者能够指导他们的学生负责任和道德地使用ChatGPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信