Insights into nurse educators' use of ChatGPT in active teaching methods: A cross-sectional pilot study

Q2 Social Sciences
Asma Bouriami , Kamal Takhdat , Sana Barkatou , Hajar Chiki , Samia Boussaa , Ahmed Rhassane El Adib
{"title":"Insights into nurse educators' use of ChatGPT in active teaching methods: A cross-sectional pilot study","authors":"Asma Bouriami ,&nbsp;Kamal Takhdat ,&nbsp;Sana Barkatou ,&nbsp;Hajar Chiki ,&nbsp;Samia Boussaa ,&nbsp;Ahmed Rhassane El Adib","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Artificial intelligence has revolutionized nursing education with the emergence of ChatGPT, which has the potential to transform active teaching methods. Despite this potential, there is still insufficient literature on the use of ChatGPT in nursing education. The aim of this pilot study is to examine nurse educators' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ChatGPT, as well as their experience of using ChatGPT in active teaching methods.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects and methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study using a self-administered questionnaire with 104 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although 61.52% of participants have an average level of knowledge about ChatGPT, they are not very familiar with its use, as 59.6% do not use it. In fact, 70.52% expressed indifference or negativity towards the use of ChatGPT by their students. Furthermore, male educators are five times more likely to believe that ChatGPT facilitates students cheating (OR = 5.147 (1.641; 16.141)).</div><div>Despite being aware of the challenges associated with ChatGPT, educators in our sample demonstrate limited awareness of its potential applications in active teaching methods. For instance, only 33.33% use ChatGPT in problem-based learning, while a mere 10% use ChatGPT in simulation-based learning. This reluctance extends to use ChatGPT in teaching activities such as preparing pedagogical content (8.69%) and the design of assessment tools (9.78%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementing institutional guidelines and providing nurse educators with training on the potential applications of ChatGPT are essential for promoting positive change in nursing education. This will enable educators to guide their students in the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 101006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324001219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Artificial intelligence has revolutionized nursing education with the emergence of ChatGPT, which has the potential to transform active teaching methods. Despite this potential, there is still insufficient literature on the use of ChatGPT in nursing education. The aim of this pilot study is to examine nurse educators' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ChatGPT, as well as their experience of using ChatGPT in active teaching methods.

Subjects and methods

We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study using a self-administered questionnaire with 104 participants.

Results

Although 61.52% of participants have an average level of knowledge about ChatGPT, they are not very familiar with its use, as 59.6% do not use it. In fact, 70.52% expressed indifference or negativity towards the use of ChatGPT by their students. Furthermore, male educators are five times more likely to believe that ChatGPT facilitates students cheating (OR = 5.147 (1.641; 16.141)).
Despite being aware of the challenges associated with ChatGPT, educators in our sample demonstrate limited awareness of its potential applications in active teaching methods. For instance, only 33.33% use ChatGPT in problem-based learning, while a mere 10% use ChatGPT in simulation-based learning. This reluctance extends to use ChatGPT in teaching activities such as preparing pedagogical content (8.69%) and the design of assessment tools (9.78%).

Conclusion

Implementing institutional guidelines and providing nurse educators with training on the potential applications of ChatGPT are essential for promoting positive change in nursing education. This will enable educators to guide their students in the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信