Barreras identificadas para el ejercicio de las buenas prácticas docentes en especialidades médicas

Q2 Social Sciences
Ximena Lee Muñoz , Karin Kleinsteuber Saá , Paula Soto Reyes , Mariela Torrente Avendaño , Christel Hanne Altermatt
{"title":"Barreras identificadas para el ejercicio de las buenas prácticas docentes en especialidades médicas","authors":"Ximena Lee Muñoz ,&nbsp;Karin Kleinsteuber Saá ,&nbsp;Paula Soto Reyes ,&nbsp;Mariela Torrente Avendaño ,&nbsp;Christel Hanne Altermatt","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The University of Chile seeks to integrate student diversity and teaching quality beyond academic achievement. Facing tensions and inadequate practices, such as mistreatment in the clinical setting, the School of Medicine strives to transform teaching, promoting responsible and quality practices. This article aims to determine how certain barriers affect the implementation of good practices in clinical education, to overcome obstacles in the training of health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The methodology for data collection was through a retrospective and interpretative qualitative content analysis of 442 reports from 308 participants of the continuing education course <em>Good Teaching Practices</em>, whose approach was inspired by the SoTL (Scholarship of Teaching and Learning) approach, to develop and enhance the training process, improving the committed learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interpretative analysis made it possible to distinguish three categories that typify teacher mistreatment: 1) discrimination (by gender, nationality, and appearance), 2) abuse (by work and academic overload, and public humiliation), and 3) poor teaching example (by inadequate teacher modeling).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Health educators should be aware of the barriers identified to eradicate the culture of abuse in clinical settings previously seen as effective in medical education. This research provides a solid foundation for the institution to address critical areas in education and guide the community toward practices that reflect superior educational quality and meaningful change in the short and long term.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 100995"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324001104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The University of Chile seeks to integrate student diversity and teaching quality beyond academic achievement. Facing tensions and inadequate practices, such as mistreatment in the clinical setting, the School of Medicine strives to transform teaching, promoting responsible and quality practices. This article aims to determine how certain barriers affect the implementation of good practices in clinical education, to overcome obstacles in the training of health professionals.

Material and methods

The methodology for data collection was through a retrospective and interpretative qualitative content analysis of 442 reports from 308 participants of the continuing education course Good Teaching Practices, whose approach was inspired by the SoTL (Scholarship of Teaching and Learning) approach, to develop and enhance the training process, improving the committed learning outcomes.

Results

The interpretative analysis made it possible to distinguish three categories that typify teacher mistreatment: 1) discrimination (by gender, nationality, and appearance), 2) abuse (by work and academic overload, and public humiliation), and 3) poor teaching example (by inadequate teacher modeling).

Conclusion

Health educators should be aware of the barriers identified to eradicate the culture of abuse in clinical settings previously seen as effective in medical education. This research provides a solid foundation for the institution to address critical areas in education and guide the community toward practices that reflect superior educational quality and meaningful change in the short and long term.
在实践医学专业的良好教学做法方面查明的障碍
智利大学寻求整合学生的多样性和教学质量超越学术成就。面对紧张和不充分的实践,如临床环境中的虐待,医学院努力改变教学,促进负责任和高质量的实践。本文旨在确定某些障碍如何影响临床教育中良好做法的实施,以克服卫生专业人员培训中的障碍。资料和方法资料收集的方法是通过对308名继续教育课程“良好教学实践”参与者的442份报告进行回顾性和解释性定性内容分析,该课程的方法受到“教与学奖学金”方法的启发,以发展和加强培训过程,改善承诺的学习成果。结果通过解释性分析,可以区分三类典型的教师虐待:1)歧视(性别、国籍和外貌),2)虐待(工作和学业负担过重,以及公开羞辱),3)不良教学榜样(教师榜样不足)。结论卫生教育工作者应该意识到在医学教育中被认为有效的临床环境中根除虐待文化的障碍。这项研究为该机构解决教育中的关键领域提供了坚实的基础,并指导社区采取反映卓越教育质量和短期和长期有意义变化的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信