Impact of genera-specific traits on wood-to-charcoal conversion rates: Implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction in European Palaeolithic contexts
{"title":"Impact of genera-specific traits on wood-to-charcoal conversion rates: Implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction in European Palaeolithic contexts","authors":"Rupert Knight","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction, especially in prehistoric contexts, is frequently dependent on anthracology, the identification of charcoal to at least the genus level. However, in order to understand past arboreal compositions, and by proxy wider environments and hominin-environment interactions, the charcoal found must accurately represent the original hearth assemblages, to enable further interpretations of local palaeoenvironments. Several filters affect this, including anthropogenic fuel choice, differential charcoal fragmentation, and varying archaeological recovery and identification techniques between sites. A further potentially confusing factor is genera-specific wood-to-charcoal conversion rates, whereby different genera of woods, through specific morphological or chemical characteristics, commonly create different quantities of charcoal on burning. It is debated whether this is an issue at all; to address this, this paper tests the wood-to-charcoal conversion rates of 42 arboreal and shrubby genera identified in Palaeolithic European contexts, burning them at 350 °C and 700 °C. Whilst those at 700 °C created somewhat random quantities of charcoal, genera-specific differences were identified at 350 °C, correlating with deciduous, evergreen and coniferous tree types, with conifers creating far more charcoal than other trees. These findings have wide applications for all palaeoenvironmental reconstruction relying on anthracology, especially where conifers are common.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 109113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124006152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction, especially in prehistoric contexts, is frequently dependent on anthracology, the identification of charcoal to at least the genus level. However, in order to understand past arboreal compositions, and by proxy wider environments and hominin-environment interactions, the charcoal found must accurately represent the original hearth assemblages, to enable further interpretations of local palaeoenvironments. Several filters affect this, including anthropogenic fuel choice, differential charcoal fragmentation, and varying archaeological recovery and identification techniques between sites. A further potentially confusing factor is genera-specific wood-to-charcoal conversion rates, whereby different genera of woods, through specific morphological or chemical characteristics, commonly create different quantities of charcoal on burning. It is debated whether this is an issue at all; to address this, this paper tests the wood-to-charcoal conversion rates of 42 arboreal and shrubby genera identified in Palaeolithic European contexts, burning them at 350 °C and 700 °C. Whilst those at 700 °C created somewhat random quantities of charcoal, genera-specific differences were identified at 350 °C, correlating with deciduous, evergreen and coniferous tree types, with conifers creating far more charcoal than other trees. These findings have wide applications for all palaeoenvironmental reconstruction relying on anthracology, especially where conifers are common.
期刊介绍:
Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.