Enhancing slow sand filtration with 3D-printed eco-friendly bricks

Wathsala Benthota Pathiranage , Chloe Sharp , Yinshan Hong , Cecylia Williams , Omar Algharibeh , Anna McKnight , Clinton Williams , Hunain Alkhateb , Matteo D’Alessio
{"title":"Enhancing slow sand filtration with 3D-printed eco-friendly bricks","authors":"Wathsala Benthota Pathiranage ,&nbsp;Chloe Sharp ,&nbsp;Yinshan Hong ,&nbsp;Cecylia Williams ,&nbsp;Omar Algharibeh ,&nbsp;Anna McKnight ,&nbsp;Clinton Williams ,&nbsp;Hunain Alkhateb ,&nbsp;Matteo D’Alessio","doi":"10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wastewater reuse after adequate treatment represents a sustainable approach and a valuable alternative source to mitigate the current water scarcity. In wastewater treatment, low-cost and low-tech approaches draw attention as small/rural communities struggle to achieve the anticipated water quality standards due to insufficient funds, or expert knowledge in implementing and maintaining high-tech treatment methods. This study evaluated the ability of two low-cost and sustainable materials, clay and crawfish shell waste to produce 3D-printed bricks to remove turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), total coliforms and <em>E. coli</em>. Additionally, the study included an investigation of their ability to remove contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Three different bench-scale reactors were built for the study, 1) a reactor with 3D-printed crawfish shell waste bricks (90 % clay and 10 % crawfish shell waste by weight) with sand, 2) a reactor with 3D-printed clay bricks with sand, and 3) a control (without 3D printed bricks) with only sand. All three systems, including the control, effectively removed turbidity (up to 96 %), total coliforms (up to 99 %) and <em>E. coli</em> (up to 99 %). Although the changes in removal efficiencies were not statistically different, the sand filter with clay bricks showed the highest removal rates for turbidity (87.1 % ± 7.1), COD (55 % ± 18.6) and TOC (47 % ± 27). Among the different CECs analyzed, the highest removal rates were recorded for fluoxetine (100 % removal), diphenhydramine (&gt;90 % removal) and erythromycin (60 % – 100 % removal) regardless of the reactor used. However, the reactor with crawfish bricks outperformed the other two in removing CECs exhibiting a 40 % – 80 % removal such as trimethoprim, tramadol, irbesartan, guaifenesin, gabapentin and losartan, as well as CECs exhibiting a relatively low removal (10 – 40 %) including lidocaine and sucralose. Sucralose is the only emerging contaminant with a statistically significant difference among the reactors, with the crawfish bricks showing significantly higher removal compared to the clay bricks (<em>p</em> = 0.026).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100257,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Water","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wastewater reuse after adequate treatment represents a sustainable approach and a valuable alternative source to mitigate the current water scarcity. In wastewater treatment, low-cost and low-tech approaches draw attention as small/rural communities struggle to achieve the anticipated water quality standards due to insufficient funds, or expert knowledge in implementing and maintaining high-tech treatment methods. This study evaluated the ability of two low-cost and sustainable materials, clay and crawfish shell waste to produce 3D-printed bricks to remove turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), total coliforms and E. coli. Additionally, the study included an investigation of their ability to remove contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Three different bench-scale reactors were built for the study, 1) a reactor with 3D-printed crawfish shell waste bricks (90 % clay and 10 % crawfish shell waste by weight) with sand, 2) a reactor with 3D-printed clay bricks with sand, and 3) a control (without 3D printed bricks) with only sand. All three systems, including the control, effectively removed turbidity (up to 96 %), total coliforms (up to 99 %) and E. coli (up to 99 %). Although the changes in removal efficiencies were not statistically different, the sand filter with clay bricks showed the highest removal rates for turbidity (87.1 % ± 7.1), COD (55 % ± 18.6) and TOC (47 % ± 27). Among the different CECs analyzed, the highest removal rates were recorded for fluoxetine (100 % removal), diphenhydramine (>90 % removal) and erythromycin (60 % – 100 % removal) regardless of the reactor used. However, the reactor with crawfish bricks outperformed the other two in removing CECs exhibiting a 40 % – 80 % removal such as trimethoprim, tramadol, irbesartan, guaifenesin, gabapentin and losartan, as well as CECs exhibiting a relatively low removal (10 – 40 %) including lidocaine and sucralose. Sucralose is the only emerging contaminant with a statistically significant difference among the reactors, with the crawfish bricks showing significantly higher removal compared to the clay bricks (p = 0.026).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信