Multiresponse kinetics with estimation of the experimental variance-covariance matrix. A full Bayesian analysis using Stan

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
M.A.J.S. van Boekel
{"title":"Multiresponse kinetics with estimation of the experimental variance-covariance matrix. A full Bayesian analysis using Stan","authors":"M.A.J.S. van Boekel","doi":"10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiresponse analysis is a powerful technique to unravel complex kinetic chemical reaction schemes. Box and Draper (1965) showed that least-squares analysis of multiresponse measurements can be inappropriate if measurements are correlated, which will be frequently the case. Insight into the experimental variance-covariance matrix is therefore important, but this matrix is usually unknown. Using a Bayesian analysis, Box and Draper (1965) integrated out the experimental variance-covariance matrix to find an approximate solution for parameter estimates, called the determinant criterion. Nowadays, a full Bayesian analysis is possible via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling that does allow to estimate the full experimental variance-covariance matrix, next to the common kinetic parameter estimates. Two multiresponse examples are discussed to investigate this, using the probabilistic language Stan coupled to R. One example is the simulated data set used by Box and Draper (twelve runs with three components), the other a much-used real data set on heat-induced isomerization of <span><math><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow></math></span>-pinene (nine runs with six components). One main result is that with both data sets the experimental variance-covariance matrix could be estimated, which gives much insight in the properties of the experimental data and further statistical analysis. Another main result is that, at least for the pinene data set, least-squares analysis leads to unrealistic precise estimates compared to the Bayesian solution, showing that it is worthwhile to use the Bayesian solution. An additional result is that the generally accepted mechanism for the pinene data set is questionable. Overall, the results show that Stan is a great addition to the toolkit of the kineticist for multiresponse kinetics analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Engineering","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 112455"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260877424005211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiresponse analysis is a powerful technique to unravel complex kinetic chemical reaction schemes. Box and Draper (1965) showed that least-squares analysis of multiresponse measurements can be inappropriate if measurements are correlated, which will be frequently the case. Insight into the experimental variance-covariance matrix is therefore important, but this matrix is usually unknown. Using a Bayesian analysis, Box and Draper (1965) integrated out the experimental variance-covariance matrix to find an approximate solution for parameter estimates, called the determinant criterion. Nowadays, a full Bayesian analysis is possible via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling that does allow to estimate the full experimental variance-covariance matrix, next to the common kinetic parameter estimates. Two multiresponse examples are discussed to investigate this, using the probabilistic language Stan coupled to R. One example is the simulated data set used by Box and Draper (twelve runs with three components), the other a much-used real data set on heat-induced isomerization of α-pinene (nine runs with six components). One main result is that with both data sets the experimental variance-covariance matrix could be estimated, which gives much insight in the properties of the experimental data and further statistical analysis. Another main result is that, at least for the pinene data set, least-squares analysis leads to unrealistic precise estimates compared to the Bayesian solution, showing that it is worthwhile to use the Bayesian solution. An additional result is that the generally accepted mechanism for the pinene data set is questionable. Overall, the results show that Stan is a great addition to the toolkit of the kineticist for multiresponse kinetics analysis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Engineering
Journal of Food Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research and review papers on any subject at the interface between food and engineering, particularly those of relevance to industry, including: Engineering properties of foods, food physics and physical chemistry; processing, measurement, control, packaging, storage and distribution; engineering aspects of the design and production of novel foods and of food service and catering; design and operation of food processes, plant and equipment; economics of food engineering, including the economics of alternative processes. Accounts of food engineering achievements are of particular value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信