Failure mode effect analysis use and limitations in medical device risk management

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Niamh Nolan, Olivia McDermott
{"title":"Failure mode effect analysis use and limitations in medical device risk management","authors":"Niamh Nolan,&nbsp;Olivia McDermott","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to investigate the application of risk analysis techniques in the medical device industry and the techniques most utilised to address compliance with ISO 14971:2019 with a view to assessing the challenges of risk management. Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) and its limitations as a tool are also investigated, as well as the risk management competencies that may contribute to effective risk management implementation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with risk management experts to gain insights into current risk management practices and challenges. The study found that FMEA is the most utilised risk analysis tool by the medical device industry but does not meet all risk analysis requirements per ISO14971:2019. FMEA focuses on device functionality and risk of failure and does not account for safety risks during normal device usage. It is the first focussed study on FMEA limitations in the medical device risk assessment process, and the study can be utilised to inform regulatory policy and industry best practices. Benchmarking the pros and cons of FMEA as a tool can strengthen Risk management thinking and deployment. This study is also novel in relation to the analysis of risk analysis requirements per ISO 14971, as well as looking at risk management competency gaps in Medtech in terms of risk analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 1","pages":"Article 100439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124002336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the application of risk analysis techniques in the medical device industry and the techniques most utilised to address compliance with ISO 14971:2019 with a view to assessing the challenges of risk management. Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) and its limitations as a tool are also investigated, as well as the risk management competencies that may contribute to effective risk management implementation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with risk management experts to gain insights into current risk management practices and challenges. The study found that FMEA is the most utilised risk analysis tool by the medical device industry but does not meet all risk analysis requirements per ISO14971:2019. FMEA focuses on device functionality and risk of failure and does not account for safety risks during normal device usage. It is the first focussed study on FMEA limitations in the medical device risk assessment process, and the study can be utilised to inform regulatory policy and industry best practices. Benchmarking the pros and cons of FMEA as a tool can strengthen Risk management thinking and deployment. This study is also novel in relation to the analysis of risk analysis requirements per ISO 14971, as well as looking at risk management competency gaps in Medtech in terms of risk analysis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信