A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine San-jia-fu-mai (SJFM) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (yin depletion syndrome)

Yang Yang, Sizhao Li, Yujie Liu, Yunhu Song, Bing Hou, Shuaishuai Zhou, Dachang Xie
{"title":"A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine San-jia-fu-mai (SJFM) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (yin depletion syndrome)","authors":"Yang Yang,&nbsp;Sizhao Li,&nbsp;Yujie Liu,&nbsp;Yunhu Song,&nbsp;Bing Hou,&nbsp;Shuaishuai Zhou,&nbsp;Dachang Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.prmcm.2025.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of San-jia-fu-mai (SJFM) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>110 patients with HFpEF and AF were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to receive either SJFM or placebo for 12 weeks. Both groups received optimal medication therapy, including dapagliflozin. The primary endpoint was the improvement of KCCQ grade, Secondary endpoints included KCCQ score, E/e', NT-proBNP, and sRAGE, assessed at baseline and 4-week intervals for 12 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After excluding 8 patients (4 in each group), 51 patients in each group (SJFM and placebo) completed the study and were included in the analysis. Both groups showed significant decreases in E/e′, NT-proBNP, and sRAGE at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with baseline (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Both groups showed significant increases in KCCQ score at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with baseline (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, The SJFM group showed significantly greater decreases in NT-proBNP and sRAGE at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with the placebo group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Significant improvements in KCCQ and E/e′ were observed in the SJFM group at weeks 8 and 12. At week 12, the SJFM group showed a significantly greater improvement in KCCQ grade (94.12 % vs. 68.63 %; χ² = 9.14, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SJFM demonstrated good efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with AF and HFpEF, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic option. The name of the trial register is “The effect of gliflozin combined with Fumai decoction on cardiac function and prognosis in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation with preserved ejection fraction”. The trial was registered at <span><span>http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667142525000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of San-jia-fu-mai (SJFM) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

110 patients with HFpEF and AF were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to receive either SJFM or placebo for 12 weeks. Both groups received optimal medication therapy, including dapagliflozin. The primary endpoint was the improvement of KCCQ grade, Secondary endpoints included KCCQ score, E/e', NT-proBNP, and sRAGE, assessed at baseline and 4-week intervals for 12 weeks.

Results

After excluding 8 patients (4 in each group), 51 patients in each group (SJFM and placebo) completed the study and were included in the analysis. Both groups showed significant decreases in E/e′, NT-proBNP, and sRAGE at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with baseline (P < 0.05). Both groups showed significant increases in KCCQ score at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with baseline (P < 0.05). Furthermore, The SJFM group showed significantly greater decreases in NT-proBNP and sRAGE at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with the placebo group (P < 0.05). Significant improvements in KCCQ and E/e′ were observed in the SJFM group at weeks 8 and 12. At week 12, the SJFM group showed a significantly greater improvement in KCCQ grade (94.12 % vs. 68.63 %; χ² = 9.14, P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

SJFM demonstrated good efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with AF and HFpEF, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic option. The name of the trial register is “The effect of gliflozin combined with Fumai decoction on cardiac function and prognosis in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation with preserved ejection fraction”. The trial was registered at http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/.

Abstract Image

中药散家复脉(SJFM)治疗保留射血分数(阴虚证)型房颤心衰的疗效和安全性的随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验
目的评价三甲复脉(SJFM)治疗心力衰竭伴保射血分数(HFpEF)合并心房颤动(AF)患者的安全性和有效性。方法在双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,110例HFpEF和AF患者随机接受SJFM或安慰剂治疗,为期12周。两组均接受最佳药物治疗,包括达格列净。主要终点是KCCQ分级的改善,次要终点包括KCCQ评分、E/ E′、NT-proBNP和sRAGE,在基线和4周间隔进行评估,共12周。结果在排除8例患者(每组4例)后,SJFM组和安慰剂组各有51例患者完成研究并纳入分析。与基线相比,两组在第4、8和12周的E/ E′、NT-proBNP和sRAGE均显著降低(P <;0.05)。两组患者在第4周、第8周和第12周的KCCQ评分均较基线显著升高(P <;0.05)。此外,与安慰剂组相比,SJFM组在第4周、第8周和第12周时NT-proBNP和sRAGE的下降幅度显著更大(P <;0.05)。SJFM组在第8周和第12周观察到KCCQ和E/ E '的显著改善。在第12周,SJFM组KCCQ评分显著提高(94.12% vs 68.63%;χ²= 9.14,P <;0.05)。无严重不良事件报告。结论sjfm对房颤和HFpEF患者具有良好的疗效、安全性和耐受性,提示其有作为治疗方案的潜力。试验登记的名称为“格列净联合复脉汤对保留射血分数的心力衰竭心房颤动患者心功能及预后的影响”。该试验已在http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信