Exploring printing methods for continuous natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic biocomposites: A comparative study

IF 8.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Natália V. dos Santos , Alberto Giubilini , Daniel Carlos T. Cardoso , Paolo Minetola
{"title":"Exploring printing methods for continuous natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic biocomposites: A comparative study","authors":"Natália V. dos Santos ,&nbsp;Alberto Giubilini ,&nbsp;Daniel Carlos T. Cardoso ,&nbsp;Paolo Minetola","doi":"10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites (CFRTPCs) are revolutionizing various industry sectors by enabling a combination of design, optimization, and high performance. The use of continuous natural fiber reinforcement integrates these factors with the potential for developing a sustainable product with a lower ecological footprint compared to tradition composites. However, challenges such as optimizing fiber-matrix impregnation and the identification of the most suitable manufacturing process for structural components remain significant. The objective of this study is to address these challenges by comparing the two main continuous printing methodologies - <em>in-situ</em> impregnation and semi-finished filament fabrication -in their application to natural fiber-reinforced composites. To achieve this, a method for manufacturing semi-finished filaments was developed and compared with the in-nozzle impregnation process by modifying a commercially available 3D printer. Image analysis, surface roughness measurements, deposition rates, and mechanical tests revealed that the semi-finished filament method resulted in better fiber-matrix impregnation, significantly improving tensile strength and elastic modulus by up to 18.4 % compared to the in-nozzle method. Additionally, the semi-finished filament process demonstrated a higher deposition rate, reaching 400 mm/s, compared to 300 mm/s for the in-nozzle process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22097,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article e01253"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993725000211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites (CFRTPCs) are revolutionizing various industry sectors by enabling a combination of design, optimization, and high performance. The use of continuous natural fiber reinforcement integrates these factors with the potential for developing a sustainable product with a lower ecological footprint compared to tradition composites. However, challenges such as optimizing fiber-matrix impregnation and the identification of the most suitable manufacturing process for structural components remain significant. The objective of this study is to address these challenges by comparing the two main continuous printing methodologies - in-situ impregnation and semi-finished filament fabrication -in their application to natural fiber-reinforced composites. To achieve this, a method for manufacturing semi-finished filaments was developed and compared with the in-nozzle impregnation process by modifying a commercially available 3D printer. Image analysis, surface roughness measurements, deposition rates, and mechanical tests revealed that the semi-finished filament method resulted in better fiber-matrix impregnation, significantly improving tensile strength and elastic modulus by up to 18.4 % compared to the in-nozzle method. Additionally, the semi-finished filament process demonstrated a higher deposition rate, reaching 400 mm/s, compared to 300 mm/s for the in-nozzle process.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Sustainable Materials and Technologies Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
158
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Materials and Technologies (SM&T), an international, cross-disciplinary, fully open access journal published by Elsevier, focuses on original full-length research articles and reviews. It covers applied or fundamental science of nano-, micro-, meso-, and macro-scale aspects of materials and technologies for sustainable development. SM&T gives special attention to contributions that bridge the knowledge gap between materials and system designs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信