The Canary hotspot revisited: Refutation of the Hawaii paradigm and an alternative, plate-based hypothesis

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Francisco Anguita , Carlos Fernández , Álvaro Márquez , Ricardo León , Ramón Casillas
{"title":"The Canary hotspot revisited: Refutation of the Hawaii paradigm and an alternative, plate-based hypothesis","authors":"Francisco Anguita ,&nbsp;Carlos Fernández ,&nbsp;Álvaro Márquez ,&nbsp;Ricardo León ,&nbsp;Ramón Casillas","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.105038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fifty years after the first modern hypotheses on the origin of the Canary Islands were put forward, a consensus on this topic seems more and more elusive. Earth scientists use increasingly sophisticated methods to refine hypotheses like the mantle plume, but they often acknowledge that the model is plagued with many inconsistencies. This work is centred around four main ideas: 1) To falsify (in the sense of <span><span>Popper, 1959</span></span>) the Hawaii paradigm for the Canary Islands, 2) to define this group of islands as a weakened lithospheric intraplate feature, hence introducing a plate-based paradigm, 3) to prove a genetic connection between the Canaries and the Atlas Mountains, and 4) to integrate for the first time the Canary Islands in the Nubia Plate kinematics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 105038"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224003660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fifty years after the first modern hypotheses on the origin of the Canary Islands were put forward, a consensus on this topic seems more and more elusive. Earth scientists use increasingly sophisticated methods to refine hypotheses like the mantle plume, but they often acknowledge that the model is plagued with many inconsistencies. This work is centred around four main ideas: 1) To falsify (in the sense of Popper, 1959) the Hawaii paradigm for the Canary Islands, 2) to define this group of islands as a weakened lithospheric intraplate feature, hence introducing a plate-based paradigm, 3) to prove a genetic connection between the Canaries and the Atlas Mountains, and 4) to integrate for the first time the Canary Islands in the Nubia Plate kinematics.
金丝雀热点重访:夏威夷范式的反驳和另一种基于板块的假设
关于加那利群岛起源的第一个现代假说提出五十年后,关于这个问题的共识似乎越来越难以达成。地球科学家使用越来越复杂的方法来完善地幔柱等假设,但他们经常承认,这个模型存在许多不一致之处。这项工作围绕着四个主要思想:1)证伪(在Popper, 1959年的意义上)加那利群岛的夏威夷范式;2)将这组岛屿定义为一个弱化的岩石圈板块内特征,从而引入一个基于板块的范式;3)证明加那利群岛和阿特拉斯山脉之间的遗传联系;4)首次将加那利群岛整合到努比亚板块运动学中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信