Differentiated TB care matrix: Validating an assessment tool for healthcare workers providing differentiated TB care using Delphi technique

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Riswana S. Ansari , Ankeeta Menona Jacob , Avinash K. Shetty , Shazia Anjum
{"title":"Differentiated TB care matrix: Validating an assessment tool for healthcare workers providing differentiated TB care using Delphi technique","authors":"Riswana S. Ansari ,&nbsp;Ankeeta Menona Jacob ,&nbsp;Avinash K. Shetty ,&nbsp;Shazia Anjum","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The provision of Differentiated Tuberculosis (TB) Care by healthcare personnel is crucial in optimising patient outcomes and resource utilisation in TB units. This study explores validating a questionnaire on differentiated TB care provision from the healthcare providers' perspective, focusing on facilitating factors and challenges in the healthcare delivery for TB patients using the Delphi Technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>A multidimensional model was designed to assess differentiated TB care provision by healthcare providers in Karnataka using inductive and deductive methods. Between January 2024 and March 2024, we used the Delphi technique via email and in-person contacts. We engaged a panel of Ten Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to refine and validate the assessment tool containing 146 items iteratively using 2 rounds of 5 SMEs each. For each round, the following metrics were calculated: Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Scale Content Validity Indices (CVI), and Item Impact Score (IIS, Face Validity). The final tool contained only questions with Item Impact Scores of ≥1.5, CVRs of ≥0.99, and CVIs of ≥0.8 (p-value &lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Item Impact Score (Face Validity) of 126 items accepted as facilitating factors and barriers in providing Differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical officers for TB patients was ≥1.5. Content Validity Ratios (CVR) for the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients was ≥0.99, except for 19 items removed from the final tool. The Scale Content Validity Indices (for relevance), i.e., S-CVI (Average) and S-CVI (Proportional relevance), for 19 items that were removed from the tool failed to reach ≥0.8.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>By determining acceptable content validity ratios and indices using the Delphi technique, this study has developed and validated a tool to assess the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by the Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The provision of Differentiated Tuberculosis (TB) Care by healthcare personnel is crucial in optimising patient outcomes and resource utilisation in TB units. This study explores validating a questionnaire on differentiated TB care provision from the healthcare providers' perspective, focusing on facilitating factors and challenges in the healthcare delivery for TB patients using the Delphi Technique.

Methods and materials

A multidimensional model was designed to assess differentiated TB care provision by healthcare providers in Karnataka using inductive and deductive methods. Between January 2024 and March 2024, we used the Delphi technique via email and in-person contacts. We engaged a panel of Ten Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to refine and validate the assessment tool containing 146 items iteratively using 2 rounds of 5 SMEs each. For each round, the following metrics were calculated: Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Scale Content Validity Indices (CVI), and Item Impact Score (IIS, Face Validity). The final tool contained only questions with Item Impact Scores of ≥1.5, CVRs of ≥0.99, and CVIs of ≥0.8 (p-value <0.05).

Results

The Item Impact Score (Face Validity) of 126 items accepted as facilitating factors and barriers in providing Differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical officers for TB patients was ≥1.5. Content Validity Ratios (CVR) for the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients was ≥0.99, except for 19 items removed from the final tool. The Scale Content Validity Indices (for relevance), i.e., S-CVI (Average) and S-CVI (Proportional relevance), for 19 items that were removed from the tool failed to reach ≥0.8.

Conclusions

By determining acceptable content validity ratios and indices using the Delphi technique, this study has developed and validated a tool to assess the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by the Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信