Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Templer’s death anxiety scale using item response theory

Furong Chen , Yiguo Deng , Siyu Li , Qihan Zhang , M. Tish Knobf , Zengjie Ye
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Templer’s death anxiety scale using item response theory","authors":"Furong Chen ,&nbsp;Yiguo Deng ,&nbsp;Siyu Li ,&nbsp;Qihan Zhang ,&nbsp;M. Tish Knobf ,&nbsp;Zengjie Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.ymecc.2024.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Recently, the importance of assessing death anxiety (DA) has gained increasing recognition. The Chinese version of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (C-T-DAS) is one of the most commonly used tools to evaluate death anxiety in cancer patients. This study is the first to examine the C-T-DAS in cancer patients using both non-parametric and parametric item response theory (IRT) methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included cancer patients from the \"Be Resilient to Cancer\" project in Guangdong, China, who completed the C-T-DAS after recruitment. The data collected were then randomly divided into Dataset 1 and Dataset 2 at a 1:1 ratio. Unidimensionality, monotonicity and local independence was estimated by non-parameter IRT of Mokken scale analysis (MSA) in Dataset 1. Parameter Item Response Theory (IRT) was performed in Dataset 2. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis was used to compare the gender differences in all samples.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 462 patients participated in the study. Through MSA, three items were removed, and two factors, \"Fear of Death\" and \"Acceptance of Death,\" were retained. IRT analysis showed strong discrimination, moderate difficulty, and low guessing probabilities for the items. Additionally, DIF analysis revealed non-uniform gender differences in one item from the \"Fear of Death\" dimension.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The revised C-T-DAS exhibits robust validity and reliability for evaluating death anxiety in Chinese cancer patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100896,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949877524000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Recently, the importance of assessing death anxiety (DA) has gained increasing recognition. The Chinese version of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (C-T-DAS) is one of the most commonly used tools to evaluate death anxiety in cancer patients. This study is the first to examine the C-T-DAS in cancer patients using both non-parametric and parametric item response theory (IRT) methods.

Methods

This study included cancer patients from the "Be Resilient to Cancer" project in Guangdong, China, who completed the C-T-DAS after recruitment. The data collected were then randomly divided into Dataset 1 and Dataset 2 at a 1:1 ratio. Unidimensionality, monotonicity and local independence was estimated by non-parameter IRT of Mokken scale analysis (MSA) in Dataset 1. Parameter Item Response Theory (IRT) was performed in Dataset 2. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis was used to compare the gender differences in all samples.

Results

A total of 462 patients participated in the study. Through MSA, three items were removed, and two factors, "Fear of Death" and "Acceptance of Death," were retained. IRT analysis showed strong discrimination, moderate difficulty, and low guessing probabilities for the items. Additionally, DIF analysis revealed non-uniform gender differences in one item from the "Fear of Death" dimension.

Conclusion

The revised C-T-DAS exhibits robust validity and reliability for evaluating death anxiety in Chinese cancer patients.
用项目反应理论对中文版Templer死亡焦虑量表进行心理测量评价
目的近年来,人们越来越认识到评估死亡焦虑(DA)的重要性。中文版Templer死亡焦虑量表(C-T-DAS)是评估癌症患者死亡焦虑最常用的工具之一。本研究首次采用非参数项目反应理论和参数项目反应理论(IRT)方法对癌症患者的C-T-DAS进行了研究。方法本研究纳入了来自中国广东省“抗癌”项目的癌症患者,他们在招募后完成了C-T-DAS。然后将收集到的数据按1:1的比例随机分为数据集1和数据集2。利用Mokken尺度分析(MSA)的非参数IRT估计数据集1的单维性、单调性和局部独立性。在数据集2中进行参数项反应理论(IRT)。差异项目功能(DIF)分析用于比较所有样本的性别差异。结果共462例患者参与研究。通过MSA,删除了三个项目,保留了两个因素,即“害怕死亡”和“接受死亡”。IRT分析显示,这些题目的辨别能力强,难度适中,猜测概率低。此外,DIF分析显示,在“对死亡的恐惧”维度的一个项目中,性别差异并不统一。结论修订后的C-T-DAS在评估中国癌症患者死亡焦虑方面具有较强的效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信