Multidimensional policy citation features: Insights into policymakers' policy adoption decision-making

IF 10 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Zhichao Ba , Leilei Liu , Yikun Xia
{"title":"Multidimensional policy citation features: Insights into policymakers' policy adoption decision-making","authors":"Zhichao Ba ,&nbsp;Leilei Liu ,&nbsp;Yikun Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.102004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholarly citation has been extensively utilized to explore scholars' citation behaviors and elucidate their citation decision-making during academic writing. Likewise, policy citation serves as an invaluable instrument for scrutinizing policymakers' policy adoption decisions during policy formulation. This study offers a fine-grained portrayal and measurement of policy citation features, providing insights into policy adoption decisions from a novel perspective of citation choice. Specifically, each policy citation is conceptualized as a multidimensional feature collection consisting of 26 interpretable citation features (comprising 51 measurements) pertinent to the adoption of specific policies. These features are classified into three main categories: citation authority, citation proximity, and citation continuity. Utilizing large-scale information and communications technology (ICT) policies in China as empirical data, we conduct a series of logistic regressions and Random Forest-based classification experiments to quantitatively evaluate the importance of each constructed citation feature on policymakers' adoption decisions. Our empirical results reveal that policymakers' adoption of specific policies is predominantly influenced by citation proximity, followed by citation authority and citation continuity. Notably, central and local policymakers exhibit distinct adoption patterns; the former tends to prioritize policy continuity in their decision-making, whereas the latter lean towards adopting high-impact policies and learning from policy adoption pioneers. Moreover, the impact of policies is intricately entwined with their citation patterns, with high-cited policies often spearheading policy innovations, while low-cited policies tend to follow and imitate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"Article 102004"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarly citation has been extensively utilized to explore scholars' citation behaviors and elucidate their citation decision-making during academic writing. Likewise, policy citation serves as an invaluable instrument for scrutinizing policymakers' policy adoption decisions during policy formulation. This study offers a fine-grained portrayal and measurement of policy citation features, providing insights into policy adoption decisions from a novel perspective of citation choice. Specifically, each policy citation is conceptualized as a multidimensional feature collection consisting of 26 interpretable citation features (comprising 51 measurements) pertinent to the adoption of specific policies. These features are classified into three main categories: citation authority, citation proximity, and citation continuity. Utilizing large-scale information and communications technology (ICT) policies in China as empirical data, we conduct a series of logistic regressions and Random Forest-based classification experiments to quantitatively evaluate the importance of each constructed citation feature on policymakers' adoption decisions. Our empirical results reveal that policymakers' adoption of specific policies is predominantly influenced by citation proximity, followed by citation authority and citation continuity. Notably, central and local policymakers exhibit distinct adoption patterns; the former tends to prioritize policy continuity in their decision-making, whereas the latter lean towards adopting high-impact policies and learning from policy adoption pioneers. Moreover, the impact of policies is intricately entwined with their citation patterns, with high-cited policies often spearheading policy innovations, while low-cited policies tend to follow and imitate.
多维政策引用特征:对决策者政策采纳决策的洞察
学术引文被广泛用于研究学者在学术写作中的引文行为,阐明其引文决策。同样,政策引用是审查政策制定者在政策制定过程中的政策采纳决策的宝贵工具。本研究提供了政策引用特征的细粒度描述和测量,从引文选择的新视角为政策采用决策提供了见解。具体来说,每个政策引用都被概念化为一个多维特征集合,由26个可解释的引用特征(包括51个测量值)组成,这些特征与特定政策的采用有关。这些特征主要分为三大类:引文权威性、引文接近性和引文连续性。利用中国大规模信息通信技术(ICT)政策作为实证数据,我们进行了一系列逻辑回归和基于随机森林的分类实验,定量评估了每个构建的引文特征对政策制定者采用决策的重要性。实证结果表明,政策制定者采取的具体政策主要受引文接近性的影响,其次是引文权威性和引文连续性。值得注意的是,中央和地方政策制定者表现出不同的采纳模式;前者在决策时倾向于优先考虑政策的连续性,而后者则倾向于采用高影响力的政策,并向政策采用先驱学习。此外,政策的影响与其引用模式错综复杂地交织在一起,高被引政策往往是政策创新的先锋,而低被引政策往往是跟随和模仿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信