Ultrasound and microwave assisted extraction of acorn oil (Quercus brantii): Optimization and characterization

Samaneh Niari , Nasser Hamdami , Mohsen Dalvi-Isfahan , Alain Le-Bail
{"title":"Ultrasound and microwave assisted extraction of acorn oil (Quercus brantii): Optimization and characterization","authors":"Samaneh Niari ,&nbsp;Nasser Hamdami ,&nbsp;Mohsen Dalvi-Isfahan ,&nbsp;Alain Le-Bail","doi":"10.1016/j.afres.2025.100706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to optimize the extraction parameters and increase the oil yield, by comparing both microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) methods of extracting acorn oil (<em>Quercus brantii</em>). The study demonstrates that UAE and MAE are efficient, rapid, and resource-saving techniques for extracting acorn oil compared to conventional methods like Soxhlet extraction and long-duration maceration. UAE achieved a significantly higher oil yield (7.44 %) than MAE (5.45 %), reducing the extraction time from hours to just 33 min, and lowering solvent consumption. This efficiency makes UAE particularly advantageous for industrial-scale operations seeking to minimize environmental impact and operational costs. The findings further emphasize that UAE not only provides superior oil yield but also enhances the total phenolic content of the extracted oil, achieving a value 2.5 times higher than that obtained with MAE. Moreover, UAE demonstrated no significant increase in free fatty acids (FFA), maintaining the oil's quality, while MAE conditions showed a negative effect by increasing FFA levels. In addition to yield and quality, UAE also produced oil with superior color parameters, which could enhance consumer acceptability. These results underscore UAE's potential as a sustainable alternative, capable of reducing the environmental footprint by minimizing energy use, extraction time, and solvent waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8168,"journal":{"name":"Applied Food Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502225000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to optimize the extraction parameters and increase the oil yield, by comparing both microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) methods of extracting acorn oil (Quercus brantii). The study demonstrates that UAE and MAE are efficient, rapid, and resource-saving techniques for extracting acorn oil compared to conventional methods like Soxhlet extraction and long-duration maceration. UAE achieved a significantly higher oil yield (7.44 %) than MAE (5.45 %), reducing the extraction time from hours to just 33 min, and lowering solvent consumption. This efficiency makes UAE particularly advantageous for industrial-scale operations seeking to minimize environmental impact and operational costs. The findings further emphasize that UAE not only provides superior oil yield but also enhances the total phenolic content of the extracted oil, achieving a value 2.5 times higher than that obtained with MAE. Moreover, UAE demonstrated no significant increase in free fatty acids (FFA), maintaining the oil's quality, while MAE conditions showed a negative effect by increasing FFA levels. In addition to yield and quality, UAE also produced oil with superior color parameters, which could enhance consumer acceptability. These results underscore UAE's potential as a sustainable alternative, capable of reducing the environmental footprint by minimizing energy use, extraction time, and solvent waste.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信