The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners

Kjersti Aaby, Josefine Skaret, Ingunn Berget, Paula Varela
{"title":"The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners","authors":"Kjersti Aaby,&nbsp;Josefine Skaret,&nbsp;Ingunn Berget,&nbsp;Paula Varela","doi":"10.1016/j.afres.2024.100681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8168,"journal":{"name":"Applied Food Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224002919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信