Techno-functional, nutritional, antioxidant and prebiotic potential of underutilized buck wheat flour from Western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir

Sajad Ahmad Mir , Momina Farooq , Zahida Naseem , Robert Mugabi
{"title":"Techno-functional, nutritional, antioxidant and prebiotic potential of underutilized buck wheat flour from Western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir","authors":"Sajad Ahmad Mir ,&nbsp;Momina Farooq ,&nbsp;Zahida Naseem ,&nbsp;Robert Mugabi","doi":"10.1016/j.afres.2025.100723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative analysis of the flours of common buckwheat, tartary buckwheat with common wheat flour in terms of nutritional composition, functional properties, potential health benefits and prebiotic potential. The water absorption capacity of the common wheat was recorded higher (162.3 %) among tartary buck wheat (138 %) and common buck wheat (133 %). While as, oil absorption capacity of common buck wheat was higher (179 %) followed by tartary buck wheat (177 %) and common wheat (153 %). Phenolic content in wheat flour was found to be 297.33 mg GAE/100 g, which was significantly lower (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) than tartary buck wheat (1161.33 mg GAE/100 g) and common buck wheat BW1 (1033.33 mg GAE/100 g). The probiotic potential revealed that better growth and proliferation was recorded in case of <em>Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC</em> 53,103 on tartary buck wheat as carbon source. The results showed significant difference (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) in the nutritional composition and functional properties of the flour from two buckwheat varieties, as compared to whole wheat flour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8168,"journal":{"name":"Applied Food Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502225000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of the flours of common buckwheat, tartary buckwheat with common wheat flour in terms of nutritional composition, functional properties, potential health benefits and prebiotic potential. The water absorption capacity of the common wheat was recorded higher (162.3 %) among tartary buck wheat (138 %) and common buck wheat (133 %). While as, oil absorption capacity of common buck wheat was higher (179 %) followed by tartary buck wheat (177 %) and common wheat (153 %). Phenolic content in wheat flour was found to be 297.33 mg GAE/100 g, which was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.05) than tartary buck wheat (1161.33 mg GAE/100 g) and common buck wheat BW1 (1033.33 mg GAE/100 g). The probiotic potential revealed that better growth and proliferation was recorded in case of Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53,103 on tartary buck wheat as carbon source. The results showed significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in the nutritional composition and functional properties of the flour from two buckwheat varieties, as compared to whole wheat flour.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信