Integrating environmental impacts into Cost-Benefit Analysis using emergy

Vivek Radhakrishnan , Praveenkumar Selvapathy , Matthew Garvin , Ali Khan , Chayani Perera , Fazal Rehman , Ranuka Hansa
{"title":"Integrating environmental impacts into Cost-Benefit Analysis using emergy","authors":"Vivek Radhakrishnan ,&nbsp;Praveenkumar Selvapathy ,&nbsp;Matthew Garvin ,&nbsp;Ali Khan ,&nbsp;Chayani Perera ,&nbsp;Fazal Rehman ,&nbsp;Ranuka Hansa","doi":"10.1016/j.cles.2025.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating project viability often relies on economic analysis with environmental impacts either evaluated subjectively in a separate analysis or not at all. The concept of the study was to express environmental impacts as cash flow equivalents through the life of the project to directly compare environmental and economic impacts in a standard cost-benefit analysis. Embodied energy accounting methodologies have been used as a novel method for converting environmental impacts of a project to monetary terms. With environmental impacts expressed in monetary terms on an annual basis, the present value of the environmental impacts could be calculated using an appropriate interest rate based on environmentally-focused investment for a similar project. Application of this method to a case study based on a recent wetland restoration project in eastern Canada demonstrated that inclusion of environmental impact valuation in the analysis of the project changes the project from a net-cost (CAN$-23.5 million) to a net-benefit (CAN$3.7 million) and providing a clear justification for the project. This method is applicable to projects with significant environmental impacts and can be used in a project approval process or for selecting between project approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100252,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Energy Systems","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783125000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating project viability often relies on economic analysis with environmental impacts either evaluated subjectively in a separate analysis or not at all. The concept of the study was to express environmental impacts as cash flow equivalents through the life of the project to directly compare environmental and economic impacts in a standard cost-benefit analysis. Embodied energy accounting methodologies have been used as a novel method for converting environmental impacts of a project to monetary terms. With environmental impacts expressed in monetary terms on an annual basis, the present value of the environmental impacts could be calculated using an appropriate interest rate based on environmentally-focused investment for a similar project. Application of this method to a case study based on a recent wetland restoration project in eastern Canada demonstrated that inclusion of environmental impact valuation in the analysis of the project changes the project from a net-cost (CAN$-23.5 million) to a net-benefit (CAN$3.7 million) and providing a clear justification for the project. This method is applicable to projects with significant environmental impacts and can be used in a project approval process or for selecting between project approaches.

Abstract Image

将环境影响纳入能源成本效益分析
评估项目可行性通常依赖于经济分析,环境影响要么在单独的分析中主观评估,要么根本不评估。该研究的概念是将环境影响表示为项目整个生命周期的现金流等价物,以便在标准成本效益分析中直接比较环境影响和经济影响。具体能源核算方法已被用作将项目的环境影响转换为货币术语的新方法。由于环境影响是按年以货币形式表示的,因此环境影响的现值可以根据类似项目的以环境为重点的投资采用适当的利率来计算。将该方法应用于加拿大东部最近的一个湿地恢复项目的案例研究表明,在项目分析中纳入环境影响评估将项目从净成本(- 2350万加元)转变为净效益(370万加元),并为项目提供了明确的理由。该方法适用于具有重大环境影响的项目,可用于项目审批过程或在项目方法之间进行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信