Rock, paper, scissors: Resolving the conflicting results of randomized trials involving corticosteroid, platelet rich plasma (PRP) and placebo injections

John W. Orchard
{"title":"Rock, paper, scissors: Resolving the conflicting results of randomized trials involving corticosteroid, platelet rich plasma (PRP) and placebo injections","authors":"John W. Orchard","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore whether there is evidence of a rock-paper-scissors phenomenon in injections for various musculoskeletal conditions whereby platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections outperform corticosteroid injections (CSI) in randomized trials, corticosteroid outperforms placebo whereas PRP does not outperform placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Narrative review searching for examples of musculoskeletal conditions which have high level evidence of this proposed rock-paper-scissors phenomenon.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High quality studies or reviews could be found for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), knee osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis suggestive of a rock-paper-scissors phenomenon. This was consistently in the direction of PRP injections having superior results to corticosteroid injections, corticosteroid injections having superior results to placebo, but then evidence that PRP injections were not superior to placebo. The most consistent result of the triumvirate was that PRP injections consistently outperformed corticosteroid injections in the medium-term (4 to 12 months).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There appears to be somewhat of a rock-paper-scissors phenomenon for four common musculoskeletal conditions, with the significant limitation that this was a finding of a narrative review, limited by a non-systematic search protocol. The underlying explanation is that PRP is superior to corticosteroid in the medium-term (but not the short-term), corticosteroid is superior to placebo in the short-term (only) with PRP not being superior to placebo in either short- or medium-term in well-blinded trials. The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that corticosteroid injections are helpful for musculoskeletal conditions in the short term (≤8 weeks) but are actually harmful in the medium-term (3 months and beyond). Systematic reviews which further explore this phenomenon are justified to help provide practical evidence-based advice on when to, if ever, use PRP and corticosteroid injections for musculoskeletal conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696724000309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore whether there is evidence of a rock-paper-scissors phenomenon in injections for various musculoskeletal conditions whereby platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections outperform corticosteroid injections (CSI) in randomized trials, corticosteroid outperforms placebo whereas PRP does not outperform placebo.

Methods

Narrative review searching for examples of musculoskeletal conditions which have high level evidence of this proposed rock-paper-scissors phenomenon.

Results

High quality studies or reviews could be found for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), knee osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis suggestive of a rock-paper-scissors phenomenon. This was consistently in the direction of PRP injections having superior results to corticosteroid injections, corticosteroid injections having superior results to placebo, but then evidence that PRP injections were not superior to placebo. The most consistent result of the triumvirate was that PRP injections consistently outperformed corticosteroid injections in the medium-term (4 to 12 months).

Discussion

There appears to be somewhat of a rock-paper-scissors phenomenon for four common musculoskeletal conditions, with the significant limitation that this was a finding of a narrative review, limited by a non-systematic search protocol. The underlying explanation is that PRP is superior to corticosteroid in the medium-term (but not the short-term), corticosteroid is superior to placebo in the short-term (only) with PRP not being superior to placebo in either short- or medium-term in well-blinded trials. The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that corticosteroid injections are helpful for musculoskeletal conditions in the short term (≤8 weeks) but are actually harmful in the medium-term (3 months and beyond). Systematic reviews which further explore this phenomenon are justified to help provide practical evidence-based advice on when to, if ever, use PRP and corticosteroid injections for musculoskeletal conditions.

Abstract Image

石头、剪刀、布:解决涉及皮质类固醇、富血小板血浆(PRP)和安慰剂注射的随机试验中相互矛盾的结果
目的探讨在各种肌肉骨骼疾病的注射中是否存在石头剪刀布现象的证据,即在随机试验中富血小板血浆(PRP)注射剂优于皮质类固醇注射剂(CSI),皮质类固醇优于安慰剂,而PRP不优于安慰剂。方法通过叙述性综述,寻找具有高水平证据的肌肉骨骼疾病的例子,证明这种提出的石头剪刀布现象。结果对网球肘外上髁炎、膝骨性关节炎、肩袖肌腱病变、足底筋膜炎等提示“石头剪刀布”现象的病例进行了高质量的研究或综述。这与PRP注射的结果优于皮质类固醇注射的结果一致,皮质类固醇注射的结果优于安慰剂,但有证据表明PRP注射并不优于安慰剂。三组最一致的结果是PRP注射在中期(4至12个月)的表现始终优于皮质类固醇注射。讨论对于四种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,似乎存在某种石头剪刀布现象,但有一个显著的局限性,即这是一项叙述性综述的发现,受非系统搜索协议的限制。潜在的解释是,PRP在中期(但不是短期)优于皮质类固醇,皮质类固醇在短期(仅)优于安慰剂,而PRP在短期或中期盲法试验中都不优于安慰剂。对这一现象最可能的解释是,皮质类固醇注射在短期内(≤8周)对肌肉骨骼疾病有帮助,但在中期(3个月及以上)实际上是有害的。进一步探讨这一现象的系统评价是合理的,有助于提供实用的循证建议,说明何时(如果有的话)使用PRP和皮质类固醇注射治疗肌肉骨骼疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信