José Miguel Láinez , Oscar Pradilla , Pablo Irimia , Fidel Sobrino , Michel Volcy , Pedro Kowaks , Ildefonso Rodríguez Leyva , Fiorella Martín , Lucía Zavala , Alex Espinoza
{"title":"Ibero-American consensus statement on migraine treatment","authors":"José Miguel Láinez , Oscar Pradilla , Pablo Irimia , Fidel Sobrino , Michel Volcy , Pedro Kowaks , Ildefonso Rodríguez Leyva , Fiorella Martín , Lucía Zavala , Alex Espinoza","doi":"10.1016/j.neurop.2024.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Migraine is the most common reason for neurology outpatient consultation; more than 80% of patients with migraine suffer some degree of associated disability. Migraine is an underdiagnosed disorder and patients frequently receive inappropriate treatment, which is why it is necessary to establish recommendations to improve patient management. The objective of this document is to establish a consensus position on the pharmacological treatment of migraine, including general measures and detailed analysis of the different options for the treatment of attacks and their prevention, from the perspective of Ibero-American countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>Based on the recommendation documents published by the scientific societies of different Ibero-American countries, 2 surveys were prepared; through the application of the Delphi methodology and discussions in subsequent meetings, a document was developed in consensus format, supported by evidence from the literature and expert recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A series of recommendations were agreed upon for the treatment of episodic migraine and chronic migraine, both for the acute management of attacks and for their prevention. These recommendations are based on the consensus process and a literature review, and are adapted to the regional conditions of the Ibero-American countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74283,"journal":{"name":"Neurology perspectives","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049624000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives
Migraine is the most common reason for neurology outpatient consultation; more than 80% of patients with migraine suffer some degree of associated disability. Migraine is an underdiagnosed disorder and patients frequently receive inappropriate treatment, which is why it is necessary to establish recommendations to improve patient management. The objective of this document is to establish a consensus position on the pharmacological treatment of migraine, including general measures and detailed analysis of the different options for the treatment of attacks and their prevention, from the perspective of Ibero-American countries.
Methods and results
Based on the recommendation documents published by the scientific societies of different Ibero-American countries, 2 surveys were prepared; through the application of the Delphi methodology and discussions in subsequent meetings, a document was developed in consensus format, supported by evidence from the literature and expert recommendations.
Conclusions
A series of recommendations were agreed upon for the treatment of episodic migraine and chronic migraine, both for the acute management of attacks and for their prevention. These recommendations are based on the consensus process and a literature review, and are adapted to the regional conditions of the Ibero-American countries.