{"title":"China's rise, public opinion, and growing interventionism in South America's electricity industry","authors":"Ariel.A. Casarin , Angel Saz-Carranza","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's ascent as an economic powerhouse has sparked debates over the effectiveness of dirigisme versus liberalization in key economic sectors. We study whether the modest progress in and reversals of neoliberal reforms in South America's electricity markets can be connected to China's rise as a global actor and its unique form of state capitalism. We propose that countries in which public opinion favored China over the United States were more likely to tilt from regulatory to state capitalism in governing their electricity sectors. We find robust support that increased favorable public opinion of China vis-a-vis the United States precedes the reversal of neoliberal reforms in electricity markets, shifting energy policy in those countries towards increasing interventionism. We demonstrate that the public does not need to hold specific opinions about a sector's governance to influence it. Public opinion, shaped by a role model exemplifying a particular form of capitalism, can impact the governance structure of strategic industries, such as the electricity sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103927"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China's ascent as an economic powerhouse has sparked debates over the effectiveness of dirigisme versus liberalization in key economic sectors. We study whether the modest progress in and reversals of neoliberal reforms in South America's electricity markets can be connected to China's rise as a global actor and its unique form of state capitalism. We propose that countries in which public opinion favored China over the United States were more likely to tilt from regulatory to state capitalism in governing their electricity sectors. We find robust support that increased favorable public opinion of China vis-a-vis the United States precedes the reversal of neoliberal reforms in electricity markets, shifting energy policy in those countries towards increasing interventionism. We demonstrate that the public does not need to hold specific opinions about a sector's governance to influence it. Public opinion, shaped by a role model exemplifying a particular form of capitalism, can impact the governance structure of strategic industries, such as the electricity sector.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.