John Eakins , Bernadette Power , Geraldine Ryan , Helena Strömberg , Lisa Diamond
{"title":"Who saves energy and why? Analysing diverse behaviours in 27 European countries","authors":"John Eakins , Bernadette Power , Geraldine Ryan , Helena Strömberg , Lisa Diamond","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the decision to undertake a range of energy saving actions using individual survey data. Responses to eleven different energy saving actions are examined. These actions are also grouped together under broader curtailment, efficiency and transport categories for additional insights. The final sample comprises over 20,000 responses from a Eurobarometer survey dataset across 27 European countries. Quantitative multivariate modelling is employed to examine the factors that shape the stated conservation choices. The results highlight the heterogeneity of the underlying socio-demographic and attitudinal effects. Age, gender, household composition, occupation, standard of living, accommodation status and location all influence the energy saving choice, but the effects are varied. For example, there is evidence that age has a non-linear effect which takes different forms for each energy saving action examined. The presence of children has counterbalancing effects, increasing the probability of efficiency actions, but decreasing the probability of curtailment actions. Improvements in standards of living have a positive effect on efficiency actions predominantly. In contrast, having expectations that prices will increase into the future has a positive effect on curtailment actions but a negative effect on efficiency actions. The heterogeneity in the pattern of responses highlight why energy conservation policies need a flexible approach. A one size fits all strategy is unlikely to provide enough scope to incentivise higher levels of engagement across all energy saving profile groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103922"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates the decision to undertake a range of energy saving actions using individual survey data. Responses to eleven different energy saving actions are examined. These actions are also grouped together under broader curtailment, efficiency and transport categories for additional insights. The final sample comprises over 20,000 responses from a Eurobarometer survey dataset across 27 European countries. Quantitative multivariate modelling is employed to examine the factors that shape the stated conservation choices. The results highlight the heterogeneity of the underlying socio-demographic and attitudinal effects. Age, gender, household composition, occupation, standard of living, accommodation status and location all influence the energy saving choice, but the effects are varied. For example, there is evidence that age has a non-linear effect which takes different forms for each energy saving action examined. The presence of children has counterbalancing effects, increasing the probability of efficiency actions, but decreasing the probability of curtailment actions. Improvements in standards of living have a positive effect on efficiency actions predominantly. In contrast, having expectations that prices will increase into the future has a positive effect on curtailment actions but a negative effect on efficiency actions. The heterogeneity in the pattern of responses highlight why energy conservation policies need a flexible approach. A one size fits all strategy is unlikely to provide enough scope to incentivise higher levels of engagement across all energy saving profile groups.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.