Horacio A. Aguirre-Villegas , Nicole Rakobitsch , Michel A. Wattiaux , Erin Silva , Rebecca A. Larson
{"title":"Environmental assessment of organic dairy farms in the US: Mideast, northeast, southeast, and mountain regions","authors":"Horacio A. Aguirre-Villegas , Nicole Rakobitsch , Michel A. Wattiaux , Erin Silva , Rebecca A. Larson","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emissions, eutrophication potential (EP), use of fossil energy, direct land, and blue water of organic dairy farms are evaluated in the Mideast, Northeast, Southeast, and Mountain regions of the US. Eighteen archetypical organic dairy farms are modeled with GHGs per kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) ranging between 0.83 and 1.45 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq with and 0.93 to 1.59 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq without carbon sequestration. Enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) is the major contributor (42–58%) of farm GHGs, followed by CH<sub>4</sub> from manure (15–27%), energy use (8–18%), and material inputs (3–24%). Enteric CH<sub>4</sub> is affected by feed efficiency and milk production, manure CH<sub>4</sub> by the type of manure handled and stored, and GHGs from energy by the content of fossil-fuel sources in the electricity grid mix. Manure is the major source of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions ranging from 8.2 to 24.3 g/kg FPCM. Alternative GHG mitigation strategies show potential reductions of up to 23 and 51% for individual and combined strategies, respectively. While enteric CH<sub>4</sub> is the greatest GHG contributor, manure management has greater GHG mitigation potential. The choice of CH<sub>4</sub> predictive equations, N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors, allocation, and functional units could increase GHGs up to 43% in the evaluated organic dairy farms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, ammonia (NH3) emissions, eutrophication potential (EP), use of fossil energy, direct land, and blue water of organic dairy farms are evaluated in the Mideast, Northeast, Southeast, and Mountain regions of the US. Eighteen archetypical organic dairy farms are modeled with GHGs per kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) ranging between 0.83 and 1.45 kg CO2-eq with and 0.93 to 1.59 kg CO2-eq without carbon sequestration. Enteric methane (CH4) is the major contributor (42–58%) of farm GHGs, followed by CH4 from manure (15–27%), energy use (8–18%), and material inputs (3–24%). Enteric CH4 is affected by feed efficiency and milk production, manure CH4 by the type of manure handled and stored, and GHGs from energy by the content of fossil-fuel sources in the electricity grid mix. Manure is the major source of NH3 emissions ranging from 8.2 to 24.3 g/kg FPCM. Alternative GHG mitigation strategies show potential reductions of up to 23 and 51% for individual and combined strategies, respectively. While enteric CH4 is the greatest GHG contributor, manure management has greater GHG mitigation potential. The choice of CH4 predictive equations, N2O emission factors, allocation, and functional units could increase GHGs up to 43% in the evaluated organic dairy farms.