Burning coal in a cleaner way: Institutional fragmentation, power dynamics, and business influence in Indonesia's biomass co-firing imaginaries

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Indri Dwi Apriliyanti , Diwangkara Bagus Nugraha
{"title":"Burning coal in a cleaner way: Institutional fragmentation, power dynamics, and business influence in Indonesia's biomass co-firing imaginaries","authors":"Indri Dwi Apriliyanti ,&nbsp;Diwangkara Bagus Nugraha","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transitions worldwide often encounter challenges stemming from the continued reliance on fossil fuel systems. Indonesia aims to sustain its coal-fired power plants by adopting biomass co-firing technology, presenting it as a strategy to increase renewable energy's share in the energy mix. This study employs the sociotechnical imaginaries (STIs) framework to analyze how these imaginaries are constructed and institutionalized in policy-making. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews with high-level government stakeholders, a state owned enterprise, and a business player, the research explores the interplay of power dynamics, institutional fragmentation, and business influence in shaping these imaginaries. The findings indicate that biomass co-firing perpetuates Indonesia's coal-dominated energy regime, framed as a sustainable solution based on affordability, energy security, and economic development. However, it reinforces carbon lock-in and delays a transformative shift to renewables. Competing imaginaries, such as concerns over the environmental risks associated with biomass supply chains, are marginalized by dominant institutions and political actors. Businesses are instrumental in promoting energy plantation forests by aligning their interests with governmental priorities. By integrating political economy and power dynamics into the STIs framework, this study exposes mechanisms sustaining systemic inertia, and highlights barriers to energy transitions in fossil fuel-reliant economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103949"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy transitions worldwide often encounter challenges stemming from the continued reliance on fossil fuel systems. Indonesia aims to sustain its coal-fired power plants by adopting biomass co-firing technology, presenting it as a strategy to increase renewable energy's share in the energy mix. This study employs the sociotechnical imaginaries (STIs) framework to analyze how these imaginaries are constructed and institutionalized in policy-making. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews with high-level government stakeholders, a state owned enterprise, and a business player, the research explores the interplay of power dynamics, institutional fragmentation, and business influence in shaping these imaginaries. The findings indicate that biomass co-firing perpetuates Indonesia's coal-dominated energy regime, framed as a sustainable solution based on affordability, energy security, and economic development. However, it reinforces carbon lock-in and delays a transformative shift to renewables. Competing imaginaries, such as concerns over the environmental risks associated with biomass supply chains, are marginalized by dominant institutions and political actors. Businesses are instrumental in promoting energy plantation forests by aligning their interests with governmental priorities. By integrating political economy and power dynamics into the STIs framework, this study exposes mechanisms sustaining systemic inertia, and highlights barriers to energy transitions in fossil fuel-reliant economies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信