{"title":"Burning coal in a cleaner way: Institutional fragmentation, power dynamics, and business influence in Indonesia's biomass co-firing imaginaries","authors":"Indri Dwi Apriliyanti , Diwangkara Bagus Nugraha","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transitions worldwide often encounter challenges stemming from the continued reliance on fossil fuel systems. Indonesia aims to sustain its coal-fired power plants by adopting biomass co-firing technology, presenting it as a strategy to increase renewable energy's share in the energy mix. This study employs the sociotechnical imaginaries (STIs) framework to analyze how these imaginaries are constructed and institutionalized in policy-making. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews with high-level government stakeholders, a state owned enterprise, and a business player, the research explores the interplay of power dynamics, institutional fragmentation, and business influence in shaping these imaginaries. The findings indicate that biomass co-firing perpetuates Indonesia's coal-dominated energy regime, framed as a sustainable solution based on affordability, energy security, and economic development. However, it reinforces carbon lock-in and delays a transformative shift to renewables. Competing imaginaries, such as concerns over the environmental risks associated with biomass supply chains, are marginalized by dominant institutions and political actors. Businesses are instrumental in promoting energy plantation forests by aligning their interests with governmental priorities. By integrating political economy and power dynamics into the STIs framework, this study exposes mechanisms sustaining systemic inertia, and highlights barriers to energy transitions in fossil fuel-reliant economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103949"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy transitions worldwide often encounter challenges stemming from the continued reliance on fossil fuel systems. Indonesia aims to sustain its coal-fired power plants by adopting biomass co-firing technology, presenting it as a strategy to increase renewable energy's share in the energy mix. This study employs the sociotechnical imaginaries (STIs) framework to analyze how these imaginaries are constructed and institutionalized in policy-making. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews with high-level government stakeholders, a state owned enterprise, and a business player, the research explores the interplay of power dynamics, institutional fragmentation, and business influence in shaping these imaginaries. The findings indicate that biomass co-firing perpetuates Indonesia's coal-dominated energy regime, framed as a sustainable solution based on affordability, energy security, and economic development. However, it reinforces carbon lock-in and delays a transformative shift to renewables. Competing imaginaries, such as concerns over the environmental risks associated with biomass supply chains, are marginalized by dominant institutions and political actors. Businesses are instrumental in promoting energy plantation forests by aligning their interests with governmental priorities. By integrating political economy and power dynamics into the STIs framework, this study exposes mechanisms sustaining systemic inertia, and highlights barriers to energy transitions in fossil fuel-reliant economies.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.