Rapid sustainability assessment of sludge management technologies for industrial scale-up

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Hossein Sabet , Shabnam Sadri Moghaddam , Farzad Piadeh
{"title":"Rapid sustainability assessment of sludge management technologies for industrial scale-up","authors":"Hossein Sabet ,&nbsp;Shabnam Sadri Moghaddam ,&nbsp;Farzad Piadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sludge reduction technologies have advanced significantly because of their potential in effective waste management. However, the need for scalable and sustainable wastewater treatment technologies is critical in addressing the challenges posed by population growth and environmental concerns. These technologies still lack a comprehensive framework that can evaluate the relationships between techno-economic, environmental life cycle, socio-policy, and reliability as well as sensitivity, and uncertainty analysis. Furthermore, the reliance on expert judgment, in evaluating new technologies, while valuable, often is slow, costly, and sometimes hindered by a lack of familiarity with disruptive innovations due to experts' knowledge gaps and constrained future outlooks. Hence, this study introduces an integrated rapid sustainability assessment framework designed to evaluate pilot sludge reduction technologies across technical, economic, reliability, environmental, and socio-political dimensions. The framework leverages a data-driven, scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach, incorporating rigorous sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to enhance the reliability of evaluations. This framework is validated through a case study involving three alternatives: (1) Anoxic/Oxic Membrane bioreactor, (2) Anaerobic Side-Stream Reactor, and (3) Anaerobic Main-Stream Reactor. Using the proposed approach, 145,530 potential future scenarios were analysed, incorporating five key criteria and 20 vital indices. The results indicate that the second alternative outperforms the other options in 86 % of the evaluated scenarios. However, its performance may be sensitive to any changes in pollutant removal efficiency, operational costs, and global warming potential when scaled to full industrial applications. In comparison to current approaches, this user-friendly framework not only shows its ability to capture a broader range of uncertainties, but also identifies trends and potential challenges that may not be readily apparent through expert intuition alone. This method also provides a holistic view of the environmental, technical, reliability and socio-policy impacts, facilitating informed decision-making for scaling pilot technologies to industrial applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 163-176"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sludge reduction technologies have advanced significantly because of their potential in effective waste management. However, the need for scalable and sustainable wastewater treatment technologies is critical in addressing the challenges posed by population growth and environmental concerns. These technologies still lack a comprehensive framework that can evaluate the relationships between techno-economic, environmental life cycle, socio-policy, and reliability as well as sensitivity, and uncertainty analysis. Furthermore, the reliance on expert judgment, in evaluating new technologies, while valuable, often is slow, costly, and sometimes hindered by a lack of familiarity with disruptive innovations due to experts' knowledge gaps and constrained future outlooks. Hence, this study introduces an integrated rapid sustainability assessment framework designed to evaluate pilot sludge reduction technologies across technical, economic, reliability, environmental, and socio-political dimensions. The framework leverages a data-driven, scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach, incorporating rigorous sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to enhance the reliability of evaluations. This framework is validated through a case study involving three alternatives: (1) Anoxic/Oxic Membrane bioreactor, (2) Anaerobic Side-Stream Reactor, and (3) Anaerobic Main-Stream Reactor. Using the proposed approach, 145,530 potential future scenarios were analysed, incorporating five key criteria and 20 vital indices. The results indicate that the second alternative outperforms the other options in 86 % of the evaluated scenarios. However, its performance may be sensitive to any changes in pollutant removal efficiency, operational costs, and global warming potential when scaled to full industrial applications. In comparison to current approaches, this user-friendly framework not only shows its ability to capture a broader range of uncertainties, but also identifies trends and potential challenges that may not be readily apparent through expert intuition alone. This method also provides a holistic view of the environmental, technical, reliability and socio-policy impacts, facilitating informed decision-making for scaling pilot technologies to industrial applications.

Abstract Image

工业规模污泥管理技术的快速可持续性评估
污泥减量技术因其在有效废物管理方面的潜力而取得了重大进展。然而,对可扩展和可持续的废水处理技术的需求对于解决人口增长和环境问题带来的挑战至关重要。这些技术仍然缺乏一个全面的框架来评估技术-经济、环境生命周期、社会政策、可靠性、敏感性和不确定性分析之间的关系。此外,在评估新技术时,依赖专家判断虽然有价值,但往往是缓慢的、昂贵的,有时还会因为专家的知识差距和对未来前景的限制而对颠覆性创新缺乏熟悉而受到阻碍。因此,本研究引入了一个综合的快速可持续性评估框架,旨在从技术、经济、可靠性、环境和社会政治等方面对试点污泥减少技术进行评估。该框架利用数据驱动、基于场景的多标准决策方法,结合严格的敏感性和不确定性分析,以提高评估的可靠性。该框架通过涉及三种替代方案的案例研究得到验证:(1)缺氧/氧膜生物反应器,(2)厌氧侧流反应器,(3)厌氧主流反应器。使用拟议的方法,分析了145,530个潜在的未来情景,包括五个关键标准和20个重要指数。结果表明,第二种方案在86%的评估方案中优于其他方案。然而,当规模达到全面工业应用时,其性能可能对污染物去除效率、运营成本和全球变暖潜力的任何变化都很敏感。与目前的方法相比,这个用户友好的框架不仅显示出它能够捕捉更广泛的不确定性,而且还能识别趋势和潜在的挑战,而这些趋势和挑战可能仅凭专家的直觉是看不出来的。该方法还提供了环境、技术、可靠性和社会政策影响的整体视图,促进了将试点技术扩展到工业应用的明智决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信