Technopolitics ‘from the ground’: Tracing ‘power’ grids and the expertise in Mekong geopolitics

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Hiromi Inagaki
{"title":"Technopolitics ‘from the ground’: Tracing ‘power’ grids and the expertise in Mekong geopolitics","authors":"Hiromi Inagaki","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technopolitics is a useful concept to investigate the strategic usage of technology, infrastructure, and expertise in (geo)political ordering. Scholars working on the Mekong region have linked it to hydropower dam expertise to understand (geo)political motivations of powerful states, agencies and decision-makers. Yet, few have examined technopolitics exercised by state engineers responsible for electricity transmissions after the ‘power’ production. By tracing ‘power’ grids in (post) Cold War Thai-Lao borderlands, this paper analyses how ‘less powerful’ states manipulated foreign expertise related to critical infrastructure. While tracing, it situates the analytical lens at the level of material and attends to ways in which technical and discursive features of grid extensions were maneuvered by actors ‘on the ground’ - engineers from expertise-recipient states. The paper reveals that Thai Cold War engineers manipulated West German expertise on grid interconnections and the U.S. geostrategic sphere of ‘power’ extensions to create and expand electric and economic ‘power’ circulations. It also demonstrates the spatio-temporal continuity of the technopolitical practice that shaped power relations between the Thai and Lao states. The paper advances conceptual linkages of technopolitics and geopolitics. Shifting attention to how foreign expertise is recast by less powerful states elicits a more nuanced view of geopolitics – one that incorporates their strategies and technopolitical ‘power’ dynamics evolving within and across their borderlands. In turn, this suggests the importance of re-contextualizing the ‘power’ flows of the U.S. and China in the Mekong. This approach of technopolitics ‘from the ground’ in Southeast Asia contributes to discussions of grounded theorizing of political economic geography.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825000083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technopolitics is a useful concept to investigate the strategic usage of technology, infrastructure, and expertise in (geo)political ordering. Scholars working on the Mekong region have linked it to hydropower dam expertise to understand (geo)political motivations of powerful states, agencies and decision-makers. Yet, few have examined technopolitics exercised by state engineers responsible for electricity transmissions after the ‘power’ production. By tracing ‘power’ grids in (post) Cold War Thai-Lao borderlands, this paper analyses how ‘less powerful’ states manipulated foreign expertise related to critical infrastructure. While tracing, it situates the analytical lens at the level of material and attends to ways in which technical and discursive features of grid extensions were maneuvered by actors ‘on the ground’ - engineers from expertise-recipient states. The paper reveals that Thai Cold War engineers manipulated West German expertise on grid interconnections and the U.S. geostrategic sphere of ‘power’ extensions to create and expand electric and economic ‘power’ circulations. It also demonstrates the spatio-temporal continuity of the technopolitical practice that shaped power relations between the Thai and Lao states. The paper advances conceptual linkages of technopolitics and geopolitics. Shifting attention to how foreign expertise is recast by less powerful states elicits a more nuanced view of geopolitics – one that incorporates their strategies and technopolitical ‘power’ dynamics evolving within and across their borderlands. In turn, this suggests the importance of re-contextualizing the ‘power’ flows of the U.S. and China in the Mekong. This approach of technopolitics ‘from the ground’ in Southeast Asia contributes to discussions of grounded theorizing of political economic geography.
技术政治“来自地面”:追踪“电力”网络和湄公河地缘政治的专业知识
技术政治是一个有用的概念,用于研究(地理)政治秩序中技术、基础设施和专业知识的战略使用。研究湄公河地区的学者将其与水电大坝的专业知识联系起来,以了解强大的国家、机构和决策者的(地缘)政治动机。然而,很少有人研究过负责“电力”生产后电力传输的国家工程师所运用的技术政治。通过追踪冷战(后)泰老边境地区的“电力”网络,本文分析了“实力较弱”的国家如何操纵与关键基础设施相关的外国专业知识。在追踪过程中,它将分析镜头置于材料层面,并关注网格扩展的技术和话语特征是由“在地面上”的行动者(来自专业知识接收国的工程师)操纵的方式。报告显示,泰国冷战时期的工程师利用西德在电网互联方面的专业知识和美国地缘战略领域的“电力”延伸,创造和扩大电力和经济“电力”流通。它还展示了技术政治实践的时空连续性,这些实践塑造了泰国和老挝国家之间的权力关系。本文提出了技术政治与地缘政治的概念联系。将注意力转移到实力较弱的国家如何重塑外国专业知识上,引出了一种更微妙的地缘政治观点——一种将它们的战略和在其边境内外不断演变的技术政治“权力”动态结合起来的观点。反过来,这也表明了重新审视中美在湄公河地区的“权力”流动的重要性。这种技术政治在东南亚“从地面”的方法有助于讨论政治经济地理学的接地理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信