Olga Rataj , Ludovico Alcorta , Jan Raes , Ela Yilmaz , Luigi Eugenio Riccardo , Federico Sansini
{"title":"Sustainability vs profitability: Innovating in circular economy financing practices by European banks","authors":"Olga Rataj , Ludovico Alcorta , Jan Raes , Ela Yilmaz , Luigi Eugenio Riccardo , Federico Sansini","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the role of financial organizations in advancing circular economy (CE) transitions, examining the tension between profitability and sustainability values. Substantial financial resources are required to support circular economy business models (CEBM) to meet the Paris Agreement targets, as the extraction and processing of materials, fuels, and food account for nearly half of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The study finds that in CE transitions, the emphasis on financial values over sustainability values diminishes within the institutional logic of financial organizations. Notably, sustainability values take precedence at the initial stages of institutional change — a unique insight. However, at later stages, financial logic begins to dominate as CE projects are expected to yield financial returns, though sustainability values remain influential. The research also reveals that lower-level managers and employees drive institutional change through a bottom-up, collective process grounded in sustainability values. Findings suggest that financial organizations must engage in both learning and unlearning, reflecting the transformative nature of CE financial innovations and the associated institutional changes. Moreover, the exchange of insights on CE is multi-directional; banks not only receive insights from external actors but also contribute their own. The study underscores that learning about CE is a collaborative effort, requiring joint efforts and shared learning among organizations, industries, and stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the role of financial organizations in advancing circular economy (CE) transitions, examining the tension between profitability and sustainability values. Substantial financial resources are required to support circular economy business models (CEBM) to meet the Paris Agreement targets, as the extraction and processing of materials, fuels, and food account for nearly half of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The study finds that in CE transitions, the emphasis on financial values over sustainability values diminishes within the institutional logic of financial organizations. Notably, sustainability values take precedence at the initial stages of institutional change — a unique insight. However, at later stages, financial logic begins to dominate as CE projects are expected to yield financial returns, though sustainability values remain influential. The research also reveals that lower-level managers and employees drive institutional change through a bottom-up, collective process grounded in sustainability values. Findings suggest that financial organizations must engage in both learning and unlearning, reflecting the transformative nature of CE financial innovations and the associated institutional changes. Moreover, the exchange of insights on CE is multi-directional; banks not only receive insights from external actors but also contribute their own. The study underscores that learning about CE is a collaborative effort, requiring joint efforts and shared learning among organizations, industries, and stakeholders.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.