Sustainability vs profitability: Innovating in circular economy financing practices by European banks

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Olga Rataj , Ludovico Alcorta , Jan Raes , Ela Yilmaz , Luigi Eugenio Riccardo , Federico Sansini
{"title":"Sustainability vs profitability: Innovating in circular economy financing practices by European banks","authors":"Olga Rataj ,&nbsp;Ludovico Alcorta ,&nbsp;Jan Raes ,&nbsp;Ela Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Luigi Eugenio Riccardo ,&nbsp;Federico Sansini","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the role of financial organizations in advancing circular economy (CE) transitions, examining the tension between profitability and sustainability values. Substantial financial resources are required to support circular economy business models (CEBM) to meet the Paris Agreement targets, as the extraction and processing of materials, fuels, and food account for nearly half of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The study finds that in CE transitions, the emphasis on financial values over sustainability values diminishes within the institutional logic of financial organizations. Notably, sustainability values take precedence at the initial stages of institutional change — a unique insight. However, at later stages, financial logic begins to dominate as CE projects are expected to yield financial returns, though sustainability values remain influential. The research also reveals that lower-level managers and employees drive institutional change through a bottom-up, collective process grounded in sustainability values. Findings suggest that financial organizations must engage in both learning and unlearning, reflecting the transformative nature of CE financial innovations and the associated institutional changes. Moreover, the exchange of insights on CE is multi-directional; banks not only receive insights from external actors but also contribute their own. The study underscores that learning about CE is a collaborative effort, requiring joint efforts and shared learning among organizations, industries, and stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the role of financial organizations in advancing circular economy (CE) transitions, examining the tension between profitability and sustainability values. Substantial financial resources are required to support circular economy business models (CEBM) to meet the Paris Agreement targets, as the extraction and processing of materials, fuels, and food account for nearly half of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The study finds that in CE transitions, the emphasis on financial values over sustainability values diminishes within the institutional logic of financial organizations. Notably, sustainability values take precedence at the initial stages of institutional change — a unique insight. However, at later stages, financial logic begins to dominate as CE projects are expected to yield financial returns, though sustainability values remain influential. The research also reveals that lower-level managers and employees drive institutional change through a bottom-up, collective process grounded in sustainability values. Findings suggest that financial organizations must engage in both learning and unlearning, reflecting the transformative nature of CE financial innovations and the associated institutional changes. Moreover, the exchange of insights on CE is multi-directional; banks not only receive insights from external actors but also contribute their own. The study underscores that learning about CE is a collaborative effort, requiring joint efforts and shared learning among organizations, industries, and stakeholders.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信