City size distribution and utility of living: Exploring intercity migration in Japanese urban systems

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Masanobu Kii , Chun-Chen Chou , Tatsuhito Kono , Toshimori Otazawa
{"title":"City size distribution and utility of living: Exploring intercity migration in Japanese urban systems","authors":"Masanobu Kii ,&nbsp;Chun-Chen Chou ,&nbsp;Tatsuhito Kono ,&nbsp;Toshimori Otazawa","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>City size has both positive and negative impacts on residents’ living utilities, owing to agglomeration and congestion effects. This study aimed to estimate residential welfare, considering migration, agglomeration, and congestion effects across 221 urban areas in Japan in the 2010s. Our findings showed the following: 1) migration from small cities to large cities worsened congestion in large cities and diminished agglomeration effects in small cities, leading to an overall decrease in residential welfare; 2) the reduction in agglomeration effects in small cities outweighed the negative effect of increased congestion in large cities, leading to a widening disparity in utility between large and small cities and potentially encouraging further migration to large cities; and 3) migration increased the income of landowners in large cities but decreased the utility of residents in both large and small cities. Findings 1) and 2) are novel insights identified through empirical analysis targeting Japanese cities. This is partly attributed to the relatively fewer land use regulations in Japanese cities compared with large cities in Europe and the United States, which have been the subjects of previous empirical studies. On the basis of these findings, the study discusses the legitimacy of policy interventions in peripheral developments from the perspective of improving residential welfare, for example, enhancing the attractiveness of industrial locations through infrastructure investments. These insights offer new perspectives for regional policy analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 1238-1257"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

City size has both positive and negative impacts on residents’ living utilities, owing to agglomeration and congestion effects. This study aimed to estimate residential welfare, considering migration, agglomeration, and congestion effects across 221 urban areas in Japan in the 2010s. Our findings showed the following: 1) migration from small cities to large cities worsened congestion in large cities and diminished agglomeration effects in small cities, leading to an overall decrease in residential welfare; 2) the reduction in agglomeration effects in small cities outweighed the negative effect of increased congestion in large cities, leading to a widening disparity in utility between large and small cities and potentially encouraging further migration to large cities; and 3) migration increased the income of landowners in large cities but decreased the utility of residents in both large and small cities. Findings 1) and 2) are novel insights identified through empirical analysis targeting Japanese cities. This is partly attributed to the relatively fewer land use regulations in Japanese cities compared with large cities in Europe and the United States, which have been the subjects of previous empirical studies. On the basis of these findings, the study discusses the legitimacy of policy interventions in peripheral developments from the perspective of improving residential welfare, for example, enhancing the attractiveness of industrial locations through infrastructure investments. These insights offer new perspectives for regional policy analysis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信