Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Nick van Eekeren , Jurre Dekker , Rob Geerts , Pedro Janssen , Anthonie Stip , Tim Visser , Jaap Bloem , Ron de Goede
{"title":"Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types","authors":"Nick van Eekeren ,&nbsp;Jurre Dekker ,&nbsp;Rob Geerts ,&nbsp;Pedro Janssen ,&nbsp;Anthonie Stip ,&nbsp;Tim Visser ,&nbsp;Jaap Bloem ,&nbsp;Ron de Goede","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intensification of agriculture has reduced both aboveground and belowground biodiversity, as well as their ecosystem services. A transition towards regenerative agricultural systems is supposed to enhance functional agro-biodiversity and create more resilient systems. For dairy or beef farming, extensification towards semi-natural grasslands and establishing multi-species grasslands are potential contributors to this transition. Both grassland types differ in terms of plant diversity and management, but it is unclear whether and how these differences translate into soil quality and soil biodiversity. An on-farm trial was set up in which the abundance and diversity of soil biota was compared between intensively managed species-poor permanent grasslands, intensively managed frequently re-seeded multi-species grasslands, and extensively managed species-rich semi-natural grasslands. Total abundance and biomass of nematodes, micro-arthropods and earthworms did not differ between these grassland types. Bacterial PLFA was higher in semi-natural grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; intensive-permanent grasslands took an intermediate position. Protozoan PLFA was higher in intensive-permanent grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; semi-natural grasslands took an intermediate position. The grassland management types only had an effect on alpha and gamma diversity in the case of micro-arthropods, with a higher taxonomic richness in semi-natural grasslands. Nematode, micro-arthropod and earthworm taxonomic community structures differed between grassland management types. Differences in abundance and diversity of soil biota between multi-species grasslands on the one hand and intensive-permanent and semi-natural grasslands on the other hand were thought to be mostly related to disturbances caused by tillage and their direct and indirect effects on soil biota and its living conditions. Consequently, longevity without regular soil disturbance is considered important for the transition to grassland systems such as multi-species grasslands that simultaneously utilise and support soil biodiversity and its ecosystem services. However, what must also be considered in decisions on the transition to future farming systems are the impacts on aboveground biodiversity (including insects and birds) and ecosystem services such as agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 105881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325000198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensification of agriculture has reduced both aboveground and belowground biodiversity, as well as their ecosystem services. A transition towards regenerative agricultural systems is supposed to enhance functional agro-biodiversity and create more resilient systems. For dairy or beef farming, extensification towards semi-natural grasslands and establishing multi-species grasslands are potential contributors to this transition. Both grassland types differ in terms of plant diversity and management, but it is unclear whether and how these differences translate into soil quality and soil biodiversity. An on-farm trial was set up in which the abundance and diversity of soil biota was compared between intensively managed species-poor permanent grasslands, intensively managed frequently re-seeded multi-species grasslands, and extensively managed species-rich semi-natural grasslands. Total abundance and biomass of nematodes, micro-arthropods and earthworms did not differ between these grassland types. Bacterial PLFA was higher in semi-natural grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; intensive-permanent grasslands took an intermediate position. Protozoan PLFA was higher in intensive-permanent grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; semi-natural grasslands took an intermediate position. The grassland management types only had an effect on alpha and gamma diversity in the case of micro-arthropods, with a higher taxonomic richness in semi-natural grasslands. Nematode, micro-arthropod and earthworm taxonomic community structures differed between grassland management types. Differences in abundance and diversity of soil biota between multi-species grasslands on the one hand and intensive-permanent and semi-natural grasslands on the other hand were thought to be mostly related to disturbances caused by tillage and their direct and indirect effects on soil biota and its living conditions. Consequently, longevity without regular soil disturbance is considered important for the transition to grassland systems such as multi-species grasslands that simultaneously utilise and support soil biodiversity and its ecosystem services. However, what must also be considered in decisions on the transition to future farming systems are the impacts on aboveground biodiversity (including insects and birds) and ecosystem services such as agricultural production.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信