Advancing urban air quality modeling with solar radiation-included computational fluid dynamics simulations

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nicolas Reiminger , Xavier Jurado , Loïc Maurer , José Vazquez , Cédric Wemmert
{"title":"Advancing urban air quality modeling with solar radiation-included computational fluid dynamics simulations","authors":"Nicolas Reiminger ,&nbsp;Xavier Jurado ,&nbsp;Loïc Maurer ,&nbsp;José Vazquez ,&nbsp;Cédric Wemmert","doi":"10.1016/j.apr.2024.102383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Air quality modeling is a challenging task due to the complex interactions among meteorological, chemical, and physical processes. Accurate predictions require sophisticated models that can simulate these interactions under varying environmental conditions. This study advances micro-scale urban air quality modeling knowledge by considering solar radiation-included Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Using data on air pollution concentration monitored in Antwerp, Belgium, this research evaluates the benefits of incorporating non-isothermal conditions and solar radiation into CFD air pollution dispersion models compared to the traditional neutral boundary layer assumption. The study analyzes twelve hourly meteorological case studies under non-isothermal conditions with solar radiation included to assess the accuracy and performance of both approaches. Findings reveal that the non-neutral CFD model outperforms the neutral model in 75% of the scenarios, with differences in the concentration maps ranging from 8% to 32%. These disparities significantly affect the identification of concentration hotspots and pollutant level predictions. Accuracy assessments against in-field monitored data show notable reductions in relative errors for the non-neutral model, averaging 21%, compared to 40% for the neutral model. While both models perform similarly under low wind speed and low solar radiation conditions, the non-neutral model generally demonstrates superior performance under higher solar radiation and more variable wind speeds. Overall, the non-neutral model offers an improvement factor of around 2 compared to the neutral model. The integration of solar radiation in CFD simulations represents a significant advancement in urban air quality modeling, with promising implications for enhancing air quality management and urban planning decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8604,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Pollution Research","volume":"16 2","pages":"Article 102383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1309104224003489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air quality modeling is a challenging task due to the complex interactions among meteorological, chemical, and physical processes. Accurate predictions require sophisticated models that can simulate these interactions under varying environmental conditions. This study advances micro-scale urban air quality modeling knowledge by considering solar radiation-included Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Using data on air pollution concentration monitored in Antwerp, Belgium, this research evaluates the benefits of incorporating non-isothermal conditions and solar radiation into CFD air pollution dispersion models compared to the traditional neutral boundary layer assumption. The study analyzes twelve hourly meteorological case studies under non-isothermal conditions with solar radiation included to assess the accuracy and performance of both approaches. Findings reveal that the non-neutral CFD model outperforms the neutral model in 75% of the scenarios, with differences in the concentration maps ranging from 8% to 32%. These disparities significantly affect the identification of concentration hotspots and pollutant level predictions. Accuracy assessments against in-field monitored data show notable reductions in relative errors for the non-neutral model, averaging 21%, compared to 40% for the neutral model. While both models perform similarly under low wind speed and low solar radiation conditions, the non-neutral model generally demonstrates superior performance under higher solar radiation and more variable wind speeds. Overall, the non-neutral model offers an improvement factor of around 2 compared to the neutral model. The integration of solar radiation in CFD simulations represents a significant advancement in urban air quality modeling, with promising implications for enhancing air quality management and urban planning decisions.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Pollution Research
Atmospheric Pollution Research ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Pollution Research (APR) is an international journal designed for the publication of articles on air pollution. Papers should present novel experimental results, theory and modeling of air pollution on local, regional, or global scales. Areas covered are research on inorganic, organic, and persistent organic air pollutants, air quality monitoring, air quality management, atmospheric dispersion and transport, air-surface (soil, water, and vegetation) exchange of pollutants, dry and wet deposition, indoor air quality, exposure assessment, health effects, satellite measurements, natural emissions, atmospheric chemistry, greenhouse gases, and effects on climate change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信