“Lacking the rural empathy”; Irish farmers' and stakeholders’ opinions on current mental health services and preferences for support

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Sandra M. Malone , Joseph Firnhaber , Anna Donnla O'Hagan , Sinéad O'Keeffe , John McNamara , Siobhán O'Connor
{"title":"“Lacking the rural empathy”; Irish farmers' and stakeholders’ opinions on current mental health services and preferences for support","authors":"Sandra M. Malone ,&nbsp;Joseph Firnhaber ,&nbsp;Anna Donnla O'Hagan ,&nbsp;Sinéad O'Keeffe ,&nbsp;John McNamara ,&nbsp;Siobhán O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Farmers face increased mental health risks such as depression and burnout, yet are less likely to seek professional help, compared to the general population. The reliance on informal support and a lack of rural health services may explain their reluctance to seek professional help. We examined Irish farmers' and stakeholders' descriptions of mental health services and preferences for an intervention. We conducted 17 online interviews with farmers, one online interview and 3 online focus groups with 11 farming stakeholders. Interviews and focus groups were conversational and semi-structured, covering perceptions of available mental health services and preferences for a help-seeking intervention. We analysed data using reflexive thematic analysis. We identified four themes: 1) reliance on informal support, 2) negative perceptions of available mental health services, 3) preferences for tailored mental health support, and 4) farm-centric logistics. Themes 1 and 2 illustrate how farmers prioritise seeking informal support, and how existing health services are ill-suited for farmers. Themes 3 and 4 describe ways that health services and interventions can tailor supports to farmers schedule, communication style, and emotional needs. Our results provide community-informed guidelines for improving current and future mental health service provision for farmers. Irish farmers seek and rely on mental health supports that are most accessible and accommodating for them; and therefore, currently rely on informal family and community support networks. In order to effectively support farmers, mental health services should be community-based to accommodate farmers’ specific cultural and occupational needs. These include accommodating erratic schedules, avoiding stigmatising language, and employing or working with farming community members to support each other.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103508"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724003127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmers face increased mental health risks such as depression and burnout, yet are less likely to seek professional help, compared to the general population. The reliance on informal support and a lack of rural health services may explain their reluctance to seek professional help. We examined Irish farmers' and stakeholders' descriptions of mental health services and preferences for an intervention. We conducted 17 online interviews with farmers, one online interview and 3 online focus groups with 11 farming stakeholders. Interviews and focus groups were conversational and semi-structured, covering perceptions of available mental health services and preferences for a help-seeking intervention. We analysed data using reflexive thematic analysis. We identified four themes: 1) reliance on informal support, 2) negative perceptions of available mental health services, 3) preferences for tailored mental health support, and 4) farm-centric logistics. Themes 1 and 2 illustrate how farmers prioritise seeking informal support, and how existing health services are ill-suited for farmers. Themes 3 and 4 describe ways that health services and interventions can tailor supports to farmers schedule, communication style, and emotional needs. Our results provide community-informed guidelines for improving current and future mental health service provision for farmers. Irish farmers seek and rely on mental health supports that are most accessible and accommodating for them; and therefore, currently rely on informal family and community support networks. In order to effectively support farmers, mental health services should be community-based to accommodate farmers’ specific cultural and occupational needs. These include accommodating erratic schedules, avoiding stigmatising language, and employing or working with farming community members to support each other.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信