Unpacking the multifaceted rurality of Hong Kong's countryside: A social representation approach

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Shenjing He , Weihang Gong , Junxi Qian
{"title":"Unpacking the multifaceted rurality of Hong Kong's countryside: A social representation approach","authors":"Shenjing He ,&nbsp;Weihang Gong ,&nbsp;Junxi Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Hong Kong, a global metropolis with a vast countryside occupying about 60% of land use, “de-ruralization” in terms of depopulation and marginalisation of rural villages has started since the 1960s. Nonetheless, it does not necessarily lead to the vanishment of rurality. On the contrary, rural spaces have been (re)appropriated and (re)imagined through the re-establishment of different internal and external socio-spatial relationships within a changing policy environment in recent years. Nonetheless, the multifaceted rurality as a socially-constructed, post-structuralist, dynamic, relational, and evolving concept remains insufficiently explored. This study thus aims to unravel the polysemic and polyvalent rurality of Hong Kong's countryside through a social representation approach, which emphasizes the importance of imaginations, positionalities, and discourses. Based on two rounds of questionnaire surveys involving both visitors and villagers, this study identifies five distinct clusters of rural representations: 1) rural idyll consumerists, consuming the idyllic image of the rural; 2) urbanists, envisaging urbanisation as the future of the rural; 3) rural utopianists, attracted by “authentic” rural lifestyle; 4) rural conservationists, with strong interests in ecological and biodiversity conservation; 5) rural dull realists, regarding rural as unattractive and hopeless. Discourse analysis and stakeholder interviews are also conducted to verify and explain the emergence of variegated representations of rurality in Hong Kong. These representations mainly revolve around a dialectical relation between rural idyll and rural dull emerging from the intensified urban-rural interactions and shaped by the uneven power relations among multi-generation villagers, urbanites, environmentalists, business interests, and government organizations. This study offers a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted rurality within a global metropolis to enrich the rural epistemology and to provide a practical framework to inform rural revitalization and conservation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103589"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Hong Kong, a global metropolis with a vast countryside occupying about 60% of land use, “de-ruralization” in terms of depopulation and marginalisation of rural villages has started since the 1960s. Nonetheless, it does not necessarily lead to the vanishment of rurality. On the contrary, rural spaces have been (re)appropriated and (re)imagined through the re-establishment of different internal and external socio-spatial relationships within a changing policy environment in recent years. Nonetheless, the multifaceted rurality as a socially-constructed, post-structuralist, dynamic, relational, and evolving concept remains insufficiently explored. This study thus aims to unravel the polysemic and polyvalent rurality of Hong Kong's countryside through a social representation approach, which emphasizes the importance of imaginations, positionalities, and discourses. Based on two rounds of questionnaire surveys involving both visitors and villagers, this study identifies five distinct clusters of rural representations: 1) rural idyll consumerists, consuming the idyllic image of the rural; 2) urbanists, envisaging urbanisation as the future of the rural; 3) rural utopianists, attracted by “authentic” rural lifestyle; 4) rural conservationists, with strong interests in ecological and biodiversity conservation; 5) rural dull realists, regarding rural as unattractive and hopeless. Discourse analysis and stakeholder interviews are also conducted to verify and explain the emergence of variegated representations of rurality in Hong Kong. These representations mainly revolve around a dialectical relation between rural idyll and rural dull emerging from the intensified urban-rural interactions and shaped by the uneven power relations among multi-generation villagers, urbanites, environmentalists, business interests, and government organizations. This study offers a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted rurality within a global metropolis to enrich the rural epistemology and to provide a practical framework to inform rural revitalization and conservation strategies.
揭开香港乡村的多面性:一种社会表征方法
香港是一个拥有广阔乡村的国际大都市,其土地用途约占60%。自上世纪60年代以来,香港就开始了“去乡村化”,即农村人口减少和边缘化。然而,这并不一定会导致农村的消失。相反,近年来,在不断变化的政策环境中,通过重新建立不同的内部和外部社会空间关系,农村空间被(重新)占用和(重新)想象。然而,作为一种社会建构的、后结构主义的、动态的、相互关联的和不断发展的概念,多面性的乡村性仍然没有得到充分的探索。因此,本研究旨在透过社会表征的方法,揭示香港乡村的多义性和多价性,强调想像力、位置性和话语的重要性。通过对游客和村民的两轮问卷调查,本研究确定了五类不同的乡村表征:1)乡村田园消费主义者,消费乡村田园形象;2)城市学家,将城市化视为农村的未来;3)乡村乌托邦主义者,被“正宗”的乡村生活方式所吸引;4)农村自然保护主义者,对生态和生物多样性保护有浓厚兴趣;农村沉闷的现实主义者,认为农村没有吸引力,没有希望。我们亦会进行话语分析及持份者访谈,以验证及解释香港乡村性呈现的多样性。这些表现主要围绕着乡村田园与乡村枯燥的辩证关系展开,这种辩证关系是在城乡互动加剧的背景下产生的,是由多代村民、城市居民、环保人士、商业利益和政府组织之间不平衡的权力关系所塑造的。本研究提供了对全球大都市中多面性乡村的细致理解,以丰富乡村认识论,并为乡村振兴和保护战略提供实用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信