Eman A. Bakhurji , Doaa M. AlEraky , Hend Alshammary , Marwah Alamoudi , Nabras Alrayes , Mohamed Hassan
{"title":"Adhesion of Candida albicans on preformed crowns used to restore primary molars: An in vitro study","authors":"Eman A. Bakhurji , Doaa M. AlEraky , Hend Alshammary , Marwah Alamoudi , Nabras Alrayes , Mohamed Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Assessing microbial biofilm adhesion to the restorative material’s surface is a key factor in determining its success. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of <em>Candida albicans</em> (<em>C. albicans</em>) on stainless steel crowns (SSCs) versus zirconia crowns (ZCs) used for primary molars.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This in vitro study involved 20 full-coverage crowns, with 10 SSCs and 10 ZCs. A fungal adhesion assay was performed to evaluate <em>C. albicans</em> adhesion, using colony-forming units (CFU) and cell proliferation assays.</div></div><div><h3>Statistics</h3><div>The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was applied to compare the groups, with statistical significance set at 5 %.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed that SSCs had a lower mean CFU value (28.28 ± 4.557 CFU/ml) and cell proliferation rate (49.74 ± 0.4367) compared to the ZC group (30.70 ± 11.0760 CFU/ml and 74.53 ± 0.7014, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that the selection of crowns for restoring primary molars may not be influenced by <em>C. albicans</em> adhesion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"36 12","pages":"Pages 1539-1543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224002852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Assessing microbial biofilm adhesion to the restorative material’s surface is a key factor in determining its success. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of Candida albicans (C. albicans) on stainless steel crowns (SSCs) versus zirconia crowns (ZCs) used for primary molars.
Study design
This in vitro study involved 20 full-coverage crowns, with 10 SSCs and 10 ZCs. A fungal adhesion assay was performed to evaluate C. albicans adhesion, using colony-forming units (CFU) and cell proliferation assays.
Statistics
The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was applied to compare the groups, with statistical significance set at 5 %.
Results
The study revealed that SSCs had a lower mean CFU value (28.28 ± 4.557 CFU/ml) and cell proliferation rate (49.74 ± 0.4367) compared to the ZC group (30.70 ± 11.0760 CFU/ml and 74.53 ± 0.7014, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that the selection of crowns for restoring primary molars may not be influenced by C. albicans adhesion.
期刊介绍:
Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.