Aerodynamic and codification study of low-rise buildings: Part I – Fully elevated structures

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Haitham A. Ibrahim , Amal Elawady , David O. Prevatt
{"title":"Aerodynamic and codification study of low-rise buildings: Part I – Fully elevated structures","authors":"Haitham A. Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Amal Elawady ,&nbsp;David O. Prevatt","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Elevated residential buildings are widely used in cyclone- and hurricane-prone coastal regions, such as Australia and the United States, as an effective solution to mitigate both storm surge damage and the impacts of extreme winds. The recent edition of ASCE 7–22 introduced wind design provisions for elevated structures for the first time, but these provisions remain under ongoing refinement. This study aims to assess the adequacy of the current ASCE 7–22 wind pressure coefficient provisions for elevated structures by conducting large-scale boundary layer wind tunnel tests at FIU's Wall of Wind Facility. The tests explored the aerodynamics of elevated buildings with varying heights and aspect ratios. Eight 1:10 scale gable-roof buildings were constructed based on post-hurricane damage reports, and peak pressure coefficients (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) were estimated for the floor, roof, and walls. These values were compared against the existing ASCE 7–22 provisions, revealing a significant underestimation of the external pressure coefficients. Based on the results, this study proposes increasing the <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> boundaries of specific zones by 50%–127% and introduces two new floor zones for more accurate estimation of wind pressure coefficients on elevated buildings. These findings have broad implications for improving the wind performance of elevated structures, particularly in cyclone- and hurricane-prone regions globally. It is envisioned that the results of this study, along with those in the companion paper, will be considered by the ASCE 7 Subcommittee on Wind Loads for potential inclusion in the next edition of ASCE 7–28, contributing to more resilient building designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 105924"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevated residential buildings are widely used in cyclone- and hurricane-prone coastal regions, such as Australia and the United States, as an effective solution to mitigate both storm surge damage and the impacts of extreme winds. The recent edition of ASCE 7–22 introduced wind design provisions for elevated structures for the first time, but these provisions remain under ongoing refinement. This study aims to assess the adequacy of the current ASCE 7–22 wind pressure coefficient provisions for elevated structures by conducting large-scale boundary layer wind tunnel tests at FIU's Wall of Wind Facility. The tests explored the aerodynamics of elevated buildings with varying heights and aspect ratios. Eight 1:10 scale gable-roof buildings were constructed based on post-hurricane damage reports, and peak pressure coefficients (GCp) were estimated for the floor, roof, and walls. These values were compared against the existing ASCE 7–22 provisions, revealing a significant underestimation of the external pressure coefficients. Based on the results, this study proposes increasing the GCp boundaries of specific zones by 50%–127% and introduces two new floor zones for more accurate estimation of wind pressure coefficients on elevated buildings. These findings have broad implications for improving the wind performance of elevated structures, particularly in cyclone- and hurricane-prone regions globally. It is envisioned that the results of this study, along with those in the companion paper, will be considered by the ASCE 7 Subcommittee on Wind Loads for potential inclusion in the next edition of ASCE 7–28, contributing to more resilient building designs.
低层建筑的空气动力学和规范研究:第1部分-全高架结构
高架住宅作为一种既能减轻风暴潮破坏又能减轻极端风影响的有效解决方案,在澳大利亚和美国等气旋和飓风多发的沿海地区得到了广泛应用。最新版本的ASCE 7-22首次引入了高架结构的风设计条款,但这些条款仍在不断完善中。本研究旨在通过在FIU风墙设施进行大规模边界层风洞试验,评估当前ASCE 7-22高架结构风压系数规定的充分性。测试探索了不同高度和宽高比的高架建筑的空气动力学。根据飓风后的破坏报告,建造了8座1:10比例的山墙建筑,并估计了地板、屋顶和墙壁的峰值压力系数(GCp)。将这些值与现有的ASCE 7-22规定进行比较,发现严重低估了外部压力系数。在此基础上,本研究建议将特定区域的GCp边界增加50% ~ 127%,并引入两个新的楼层区域,以更准确地估计高架建筑的风压系数。这些发现对于改善高架结构的抗风性能具有广泛的意义,特别是在全球旋风和飓风易发地区。预计本研究的结果以及配套论文中的结果将由ASCE 7风荷载小组委员会考虑,并有可能纳入ASCE 7 - 28的下一版,为更具弹性的建筑设计做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信