Individual motivation and self-perception of excel skills learning: An empirical study of first-generation college students and their peers

Q1 Social Sciences
Xuefei Nancy Deng , Sheng Yi
{"title":"Individual motivation and self-perception of excel skills learning: An empirical study of first-generation college students and their peers","authors":"Xuefei Nancy Deng ,&nbsp;Sheng Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organizations increasingly emphasize technical knowledge and analytical skills for their job candidates, but an overwhelming percentage of college students do not consider their analytical skills adequate. Moreover, gaps exist in digital skills between underserved students and their counterparts. This study examines the Excel skills learning of first-generation college students (FGCS) and their peers by focusing on FGCS motivation and perceived learning in a campus-wide Excel Skills Training Workshop at a four-year, minority-serving public university in the United States. Our regression analysis of 88 paired survey responses shows that FGCS were less likely than their peers to perceive a successful learning outcome, but individual motivation had a significantly positive effect on students’ perception of their Excel skills learning. Our supplemental analysis of 24 teams in the post-workshop case analysis competition reveals that students’ self-perception is inconsistent with their actual performance in some Excel skills, and students performed better in tasks that require technical skills than those requiring soft skills. Our study provides practical implications for designing scalable, effective analytics skills training programs in accounting and business education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 100947"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations increasingly emphasize technical knowledge and analytical skills for their job candidates, but an overwhelming percentage of college students do not consider their analytical skills adequate. Moreover, gaps exist in digital skills between underserved students and their counterparts. This study examines the Excel skills learning of first-generation college students (FGCS) and their peers by focusing on FGCS motivation and perceived learning in a campus-wide Excel Skills Training Workshop at a four-year, minority-serving public university in the United States. Our regression analysis of 88 paired survey responses shows that FGCS were less likely than their peers to perceive a successful learning outcome, but individual motivation had a significantly positive effect on students’ perception of their Excel skills learning. Our supplemental analysis of 24 teams in the post-workshop case analysis competition reveals that students’ self-perception is inconsistent with their actual performance in some Excel skills, and students performed better in tasks that require technical skills than those requiring soft skills. Our study provides practical implications for designing scalable, effective analytics skills training programs in accounting and business education.
卓越技能学习的个体动机与自我知觉:对第一代大学生及其同龄人的实证研究
组织越来越强调技术知识和分析能力的求职者,但绝大多数的大学生认为他们的分析能力不够。此外,服务不足的学生与其他学生在数字技能方面存在差距。本研究考察了第一代大学生(FGCS)及其同龄人的Excel技能学习,通过关注FGCS动机和感知学习,在美国一所四年制少数民族公立大学的校园范围内进行Excel技能培训研讨会。我们对88个成对调查回复的回归分析表明,FGCS比同龄人更不可能感知到成功的学习结果,但个人动机对学生对Excel技能学习的感知有显著的积极影响。我们对工作坊后案例分析比赛中24支队伍的补充分析发现,学生在一些Excel技能上的自我认知与实际表现不一致,学生在需要技术技能的任务上的表现优于需要软技能的任务。我们的研究为在会计和商业教育中设计可扩展的、有效的分析技能培训项目提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信