Indications for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Jan Zabrzyński, Adam Kwapisz, Jakub Erdmann, Maria Zabrzyńska, Michał Błachowski, Jakub Ohla, Michalina Adamczyk, Maciej Sokołowski, Bartosz Majchrzak, Gazi Huri
{"title":"Indications for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jan Zabrzyński, Adam Kwapisz, Jakub Erdmann, Maria Zabrzyńska, Michał Błachowski, Jakub Ohla, Michalina Adamczyk, Maciej Sokołowski, Bartosz Majchrzak, Gazi Huri","doi":"10.1177/03635465241309282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a major sagittal plane stabilizer of the knee joint. Even if anterior laxity can be brought under control by utilizing modern surgical techniques, internal rotational instability may not always be controlled adequately. Various surgical techniques are used to prevent this coronal or rotational instability, such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Despite an abundance of articles in recent decades discussing LET in ACL reconstruction, no definitive indicators for extra-articular tenodesis have been described in the literature.Purpose:Given the scarcity of literature assessing the indications in LET, the purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the described indications for this operation in the context of concurrent ACL reconstruction.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase using the following key terms with no limits regarding the year of publication: (extraarticular OR extraarticular) AND (tenodesis OR plasty OR augmentation OR procedure or reconstruction OR reconstructive OR surgical OR surgery OR technique) AND (ACL OR anterior cruciate ligament). We included clinical human studies based on levels of evidence 1 to 4 that were written in English. We excluded studies not written in English, case studies, reviews, letters to editors, conference abstracts, or studies containing incomplete or irrelevant data.Results:The analysis evaluated 29 articles published between 1999 and 2023. We evaluated mostly level 3 (n = 13) and level 4 (n = 12) evidence; however, there were 4 articles with level 1 evidence. The majority of the studies were retrospective (n = 21), although there were prospective studies (n = 8). The mean age of the participants was 24.4 years. The most prevalent indications for LET were high-risk sports (16 articles), medial meniscal repair/excision (11 articles), and pivot-shift test grades 2 and 3 (11 articles).Conclusion:The reviewed articles showed reduced pivoting and laxity, improved clinical outcomes, and decreased revision rates after primary ACL reconstruction. The main frequent and repeated indications for using LET in ACL reconstruction are meniscal surgery, sports activity, and grade 2 and 3 pivoting.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241309282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a major sagittal plane stabilizer of the knee joint. Even if anterior laxity can be brought under control by utilizing modern surgical techniques, internal rotational instability may not always be controlled adequately. Various surgical techniques are used to prevent this coronal or rotational instability, such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Despite an abundance of articles in recent decades discussing LET in ACL reconstruction, no definitive indicators for extra-articular tenodesis have been described in the literature.Purpose:Given the scarcity of literature assessing the indications in LET, the purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the described indications for this operation in the context of concurrent ACL reconstruction.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase using the following key terms with no limits regarding the year of publication: (extraarticular OR extraarticular) AND (tenodesis OR plasty OR augmentation OR procedure or reconstruction OR reconstructive OR surgical OR surgery OR technique) AND (ACL OR anterior cruciate ligament). We included clinical human studies based on levels of evidence 1 to 4 that were written in English. We excluded studies not written in English, case studies, reviews, letters to editors, conference abstracts, or studies containing incomplete or irrelevant data.Results:The analysis evaluated 29 articles published between 1999 and 2023. We evaluated mostly level 3 (n = 13) and level 4 (n = 12) evidence; however, there were 4 articles with level 1 evidence. The majority of the studies were retrospective (n = 21), although there were prospective studies (n = 8). The mean age of the participants was 24.4 years. The most prevalent indications for LET were high-risk sports (16 articles), medial meniscal repair/excision (11 articles), and pivot-shift test grades 2 and 3 (11 articles).Conclusion:The reviewed articles showed reduced pivoting and laxity, improved clinical outcomes, and decreased revision rates after primary ACL reconstruction. The main frequent and repeated indications for using LET in ACL reconstruction are meniscal surgery, sports activity, and grade 2 and 3 pivoting.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信