Bringing Endometriosis to the Road of Contemporary Pain Science

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marcelo de França Moreira, Marco Aurelio Pinho Oliveira
{"title":"Bringing Endometriosis to the Road of Contemporary Pain Science","authors":"Marcelo de França Moreira,&nbsp;Marco Aurelio Pinho Oliveira","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Endometriosis pain is mainly understood based on peripheral lesion characteristics and an outdated perspective equating nociception with pain. This limited view may divert understanding of interventions beyond peripheral logic, leading clinicians to see approaches targeting other processes as supplementary, limiting the effective addressing of treatment failure. Integrating critical advancements in pain and endometriosis can promote more comprehensive knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This article provides a conceptual framework focusing on overlooked or less clearly linked areas concerning the interplay between nociception and factors influencing endometriosis pain. It explores the complexity of nociceptive processing, the association between neuromerically connected structures, and the role of the brain in pain perception. Further, it emphasizes adopting mechanism-based understanding of pain that integrates neurobiological aspects of the nociceptive apparatus and related systems, shaped by psychosocial factors contributing to a possible negative spiral in those living with endometriosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Aware of such a broader perspective can incentivize a balanced effort to inquire into peripheral lesion-related mechanisms and other domains potentially impacting endometriosis pain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 6","pages":"685-693"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Endometriosis pain is mainly understood based on peripheral lesion characteristics and an outdated perspective equating nociception with pain. This limited view may divert understanding of interventions beyond peripheral logic, leading clinicians to see approaches targeting other processes as supplementary, limiting the effective addressing of treatment failure. Integrating critical advancements in pain and endometriosis can promote more comprehensive knowledge.

Objectives

This article provides a conceptual framework focusing on overlooked or less clearly linked areas concerning the interplay between nociception and factors influencing endometriosis pain. It explores the complexity of nociceptive processing, the association between neuromerically connected structures, and the role of the brain in pain perception. Further, it emphasizes adopting mechanism-based understanding of pain that integrates neurobiological aspects of the nociceptive apparatus and related systems, shaped by psychosocial factors contributing to a possible negative spiral in those living with endometriosis.

Conclusion

Aware of such a broader perspective can incentivize a balanced effort to inquire into peripheral lesion-related mechanisms and other domains potentially impacting endometriosis pain.

把子宫内膜异位症带到当代疼痛科学的道路上
子宫内膜异位症的疼痛主要是基于周围病变的特征和一种过时的观点,将伤害感觉等同于疼痛。这种有限的观点可能会转移对外围逻辑之外的干预措施的理解,导致临床医生将针对其他过程的方法视为补充,限制了治疗失败的有效解决。整合疼痛和子宫内膜异位症的关键进展可以促进更全面的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信