Andrea Shehaj, Kelly M Dopke, Abdul Wasay Paracha, Kirsten Mansfield, Michaela D Pitcher, Kaitlin Saloky, Christopher Stauch, Erdi Ozdemir, Michael Aynardi
{"title":"Cost-Effective Modeling for Management Options in Charcot Neuroarthropathy.","authors":"Andrea Shehaj, Kelly M Dopke, Abdul Wasay Paracha, Kirsten Mansfield, Michaela D Pitcher, Kaitlin Saloky, Christopher Stauch, Erdi Ozdemir, Michael Aynardi","doi":"10.1177/15347346251313652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Charcot neuropathic arthropathy (CN) impacts peripheral lower extremity nerves, leading to joint destruction, and has a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. This economic burden is further exacerbated by the projected increase in diabetes mellitus cases over the coming decades, with a corresponding anticipated rise in CN. This study assesses CN management costs through a single institution retrospective chart review and cost-effectiveness through economic modeling by utilizing a well-established equation to determine the cost-effectiveness of conservative management. This retrospective chart review from a single academic center analyzed costs and outcomes for CN patients undergoing exostectomy, arthrodesis, major amputation, minor amputation, or casting from 2000-2022. This retrospective review analyzed 216 CN patients (average age 58, 54% male). Costs were $57 949 for exostectomy, $149 009 for arthrodesis, $40 313 for major amputation, $55 035 for minor amputation, $125 851 for failed casting, and $8233 for casting. We conducted a break-even analysis that determined that intervention with casting was cost-effective compared to failed casting. Total contact casting is a cost-effective first-line treatment for CN, capable of managing non-advanced cases effectively and reducing the economic burden of surgical intervention. This study provides a critical framework for practitioners to assess cost-effectiveness in various institutional contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251313652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251313652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Charcot neuropathic arthropathy (CN) impacts peripheral lower extremity nerves, leading to joint destruction, and has a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. This economic burden is further exacerbated by the projected increase in diabetes mellitus cases over the coming decades, with a corresponding anticipated rise in CN. This study assesses CN management costs through a single institution retrospective chart review and cost-effectiveness through economic modeling by utilizing a well-established equation to determine the cost-effectiveness of conservative management. This retrospective chart review from a single academic center analyzed costs and outcomes for CN patients undergoing exostectomy, arthrodesis, major amputation, minor amputation, or casting from 2000-2022. This retrospective review analyzed 216 CN patients (average age 58, 54% male). Costs were $57 949 for exostectomy, $149 009 for arthrodesis, $40 313 for major amputation, $55 035 for minor amputation, $125 851 for failed casting, and $8233 for casting. We conducted a break-even analysis that determined that intervention with casting was cost-effective compared to failed casting. Total contact casting is a cost-effective first-line treatment for CN, capable of managing non-advanced cases effectively and reducing the economic burden of surgical intervention. This study provides a critical framework for practitioners to assess cost-effectiveness in various institutional contexts.